BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10321350)

  • 1. A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust.
    Rich DQ; Yiin LM; Rhoads GG; Glueck DH; Weisel C; Lioy PJ
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1999; 9(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 10321350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory comparison of vacuum, OSHA, and HUD sampling methods for lead in household dust.
    Reynolds SJ; Etre L; Thorne PS; Whitten P; Selim M; Popendorf WJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 9183838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures.
    Lioy PJ; Yiin LM; Adgate J; Weisel C; Rhoads GG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 9470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposures to lead-based paint dust in an inner-city high school.
    Decker JA; Malkin R; Kiefer M
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 10222569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A side-by-side comparison of dust collection methods for sampling lead-contaminated house dust.
    Lanphear BP; Emond M; Jacobs DE; Weitzman M; Tanner M; Winter NL; Yakir B; Eberly S
    Environ Res; 1995 Feb; 68(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 7601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A wipe sampler for the quantitative measurement of dust on smooth surfaces: laboratory performance studies.
    Lioy PJ; Wainman T; Weisel C
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3(3):315-30. PubMed ID: 8260840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate and one-year post-intervention effectiveness of Maryland's lead law treatments.
    Breysse J; Anderson J; Dixon S; Galke W; Wilson J
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 17559831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lead in house dust: relationships between exposure metrics.
    Adgate JL; Weisel C; Wang Y; Rhoads GG; Lioy PJ
    Environ Res; 1995 Aug; 70(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 8674482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. House dust levels of selected insecticides and a herbicide measured by the EL and LWW samplers and comparisons to hand rinses and urine metabolites.
    Lioy PJ; Edwards RD; Freeman N; Gurunathan S; Pellizzari E; Adgate JL; Quackenboss J; Sexton K
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 10981727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust.
    Sterling DA; Roegner KC; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Wilder LC; Burchette SM
    Environ Res; 1999 Aug; 81(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10433844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of lead-hazard control interventions on dust lead loadings: findings from the evaluation of the HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program.
    Dixon SL; Wilson JW; Scott Clark C; Galke WA; Succop PA; Chen M
    Environ Res; 2005 Jul; 98(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 15910785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of final cleaning for lead-based paint abatement in indoor environments.
    Grinshpun SA; Choe KT; Trunov M; Willeke K; Menrath W; Friedman W
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 11871758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two floor mat lead dust collection methods and their application in pre-1950 and new urban houses.
    Farfel MR; Orlova AO; Lees PS; Bowen C; Elias R; Ashley PJ; Chisolm JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 May; 35(10):2078-83. PubMed ID: 11393990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a wipe and a vacuum collection method for the determination of lead in residential dusts.
    Farfel MR; Lees PS; Rohde CA; Lim BS; Bannon D; Chisolm JJ
    Environ Res; 1994 May; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 8187743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Window replacement and residential lead paint hazard control 12 years later.
    Dixon SL; Jacobs DE; Wilson JW; Akoto JY; Nevin R; Scott Clark C
    Environ Res; 2012 Feb; 113():14-20. PubMed ID: 22325333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of spatially distributed exterior dust lead loadings in New York City.
    Caravanos J; Weiss AL; Blaise MJ; Jaeger RJ
    Environ Res; 2006 Feb; 100(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 16005864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achieving dust lead clearance standards after lead hazard control projects: an evaluation of the HUD-recommended cleaning procedure and an abbreviated alternative.
    Dixon S; Tohn E; Rupp R; Clark S
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 May; 14(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 10446486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory and analytical method performance of lead measurements in paint chips, soils, and dusts.
    Schlecht PC; Groff JH; Feng A; Song R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Nov; 57(11):1035-43. PubMed ID: 8931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.