These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1032343)
1. [A method for the objective evaluation of the auditory threshold]. Dahl D; Lübcke PF; Werbs M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1976; 14():79-81. PubMed ID: 1032343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [A practical method to differentiate the sensations of hearing and feeling (auditory and vibration threshold) in the low-frequency range (author's transl)]. Hülse M; Wisser R Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Dec; 60(12):624-7. PubMed ID: 7345299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Brain stem potentials and the auditory threshold]. Novák M; Janisch R Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7067008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of the CNV audiometry method. Prevec TS; Cernelc S Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):168-75. PubMed ID: 1215707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Acoustic reflex as an objective method of evaluation of the sensitivity of the auditory threshold]. Bazarov VB; Moroz BS Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1976; (2):29-34. PubMed ID: 1274076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold. Woodford CM ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and frequency specificity of auditory steady-state response detected by phase spectral analysis. Aoyagi M; Watanabe T; Ito T; Abe Y J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL58. PubMed ID: 17927308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comments on the variability of SISI scores found by Fournier and Jirsa. Byers VW J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 1002580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Correlation of subjective and objective methods of evaluating hearing threshold]. Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D Med Pregl; 2001; 54(7-8):332-7. PubMed ID: 11905181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Use of computerized audiometry for assessing the effectiveness of hearing aids in children]. Sagalovich BM; Melkumova GG Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1982; (3):17-20. PubMed ID: 7048695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Masking of the ear not studied in determining the auditory perception thresholds for ultrasound]. Khechinashvili SN; Gigineĭshvili GM; Shafir I Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1975; (2):23-8. PubMed ID: 1146072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Békesy's audiometry in the noisy environment of audio professional. auditory thresholds and the masking of noise in sound technicians with normal hearing]. Tománek R Cesk Otolaryngol; 1974 Feb; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 4452101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Objective examination of hearing by means of registration of average evoked potentials]. Khechinashvili SN; Kevanishvili Sh; Kadzhaia OA; Khachidze OA; Afonchenoko VS Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1974; (3):30-6. PubMed ID: 4619505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA Suppl; 1990 Apr; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 1970250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]