281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10324374)
1. Baltimore PSRO unveils focusing plan.
Ankrum A
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Aug; 3(8):109-11. PubMed ID: 10324374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilization review altered to advantage.
Brown DE; Levy JD
Hospitals; 1980 Mar; 54(5):83-6. PubMed ID: 7188763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in average length of stay and average charges generated following institution of PSRO review.
Westphal M; Frazier E; Miller MC
Health Serv Res; 1979; 14(4):253-65. PubMed ID: 393658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review.
Dittman DA
Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital pays PSRO to review private patients.
Kaufman A
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Oct; 3(10):133-4. PubMed ID: 10273102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The data game: challenges to the PSRO program.
Glass HS
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):24-6. PubMed ID: 104223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Focusing PSRO heat where it belongs.
Patient Care; 1979 Mar; 13(5):229-32, 239. PubMed ID: 10273128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyzing inpatient hospital duration and intensity, Part II. Results of a pilot study.
Studnicki J; Honemann D
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 May; 9(5):139-46. PubMed ID: 6408560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PSRO monitoring: trend analysis and peer review.
Routch S
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10297487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel plan simplifies review, saves money.
Borchardt PJ
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Nov; 3(11):147-8. PubMed ID: 10273106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. H.E.W. orders focusing out.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Aug; 3(8):109. PubMed ID: 10273069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Group hopes to cut costs by monitoring hospital stays.
Bus Insur; 1983 Mar; 17(11):33. PubMed ID: 10273341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Care level and timeliness review--an approach to curbing inappropriate hospital utilization.
Edwards AB
Top Health Care Financ; 1981; 7(3):47-60. PubMed ID: 7193922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated utilization review is timely, accurate, efficient.
Schmitz HH; Schoenhard WC
Hosp Prog; 1976 Jul; 57(7):73-7, 98. PubMed ID: 945789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PSRO takes aim at ancillary service use.
Lipp C
Hosp Peer Rev; 1980 Mar; 5(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10273187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Focusing out review.
Pfeffer L
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Oct; 3(10):134. PubMed ID: 10239212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Length of stay variations: a focused review.
Horn SD; Roveti GC; Kreitzer SL
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Feb; 6(2):6-12. PubMed ID: 6785688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing inpatient hospital duration and intensity: a methodology.
Studnicki J; Honemann D
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Sep; 8(9):15-26. PubMed ID: 6815604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Professional Standards Review Organization studies length of stay for cataract extraction in District of Columbia hospitals.
Zimmerman MH; Schlein P; Fuller NA; Carrier E
Public Health Rep; 1981; 96(5):439-41. PubMed ID: 7197378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization review in the United States: results from a 1976-1977 national survey of hospitals.
Gertman PM; Monheit AC; Anderson JJ; Eagle JB; Levenson DK
Med Care; 1979 Aug; 17(8 Suppl):i-iii, 1-148. PubMed ID: 381795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
