127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10325203)
1. Surveys gain impressive stats.
Titus K
CAP Today; 1987 Sep; 1(9):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 10325203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surveys: more than stargazing.
Rippey JH
CAP Today; 1987 Sep; 1(9):2, 4, 20. PubMed ID: 10288495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CAP (College of American Pathologists) program probes lab quality.
Koska MT
Trustee; 1989 Oct; 42(10):15. PubMed ID: 10295758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A creative approach to documenting patient education.
Begay TL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Nov; 29(11):34-6, 38. PubMed ID: 10174096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology raw data.
Lepore PD
Toxicol Pathol; 1996; 24(1):147. PubMed ID: 8839292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The College of American Pathologists, 1946-1996. The surveys program.
Wagner LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 9199636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The business man and the laboratory: standards guarantee profits.
Hamer JW
Malays J Pathol; 1997 Dec; 19(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10879248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
Tholen DW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer testing scandal shines spotlight on black box of clinical laboratory testing.
Hede K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jun; 100(12):836-7, 844. PubMed ID: 18544732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CAP laboratory standard leads to controversy.
Chapman-Cliburn G
Hospitals; 1988 Mar; 62(5):67, 69-70. PubMed ID: 3338781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assurance and the clinical laboratory.
Wong ET; Nelson JM
JAMA; 1988 May; 259(17):2584-5. PubMed ID: 3162750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
Fraser CG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory standardization.
Kisner HJ
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1999; 13(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 10557887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Collaborative Lab Advantage program to combine expertise, services.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Mar; 23(3):5. PubMed ID: 12685286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protection against lab-acquired infection: a new safety manual.
Hallam K
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Jan; 20(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 10285821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving quality of care in cath labs: an ACC initiative.
Cohen AG; Mermelstein PD; McEntee CW
J Cardiovasc Manag; 2001; 12(6):17-20. PubMed ID: 11765623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter).
Lundberg GD
JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):709. PubMed ID: 2296129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pump up your PT IQ.
Cembrowski GS; Anderson PG; Crampton CA; Coupland R; Carey RN
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Jan; 28(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10172547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardisation of pathology laboratories in Pakistan: Where we stand today.
Ahmad SA; Aamir M; Ahmad M; Javed M; Memon A
Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():38-42. PubMed ID: 29307781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Growing into laboratory quality assurance.
Berte LM
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1990 Feb; 22(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 10106382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
