121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10326063)
1. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.
Dowthwaite JN; Dunsmore KA; Wang D; Rosenbaum PF; Scerpella TA
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 28258886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Wu XP; Wacker WK; Ergun DL; Levine MA
J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2208-16. PubMed ID: 22623101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Establishment and evaluation of bone mineral density reference databases appropriate for diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis in Chinese women.
Liao EY; Wu XP; Luo XH; Zhang H; Dai RC; Huang G; Wang WB
J Bone Miner Metab; 2003; 21(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 12720054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years.
Ward KA; Ashby RL; Roberts SA; Adams JE; Zulf Mughal M
Arch Dis Child; 2007 Jan; 92(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16943261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population bone mineral density measurements for Chinese women and men in Hong Kong.
Woo J; Li M; Lau E
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11420778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-based assessment of male patients using standardized bone density values and a national reference database.
Goemaere S; Vanderschueren D; Kaufman JM; Reginster JY; Boutsen Y; Poriau S; Callens J; Raeman F; Depresseux G; Borghs H; Devogelaer JP; Boonen S; ;
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 17289523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
Peel NF; Eastell R
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer.
Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 11095175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Lu Y
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 17616413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
