BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10326063)

  • 21. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. II: Studies in vivo.
    Eiken P; Kolthoff N; Bärenholdt O; Hermansen F; Pors Nielsen S
    Bone; 1994; 15(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 7873296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.
    Hui SL; Gao S; Zhou XH; Johnston CC; Lu Y; Glüer CC; Grampp S; Genant H
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1463-70. PubMed ID: 9286763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for forearm bone mineral density measurements.
    Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 17584510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
    Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
    J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
    Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle.
    Lu Y; Fuerst T; Hui S; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 11446558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
    Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis in children with bladder augmentation.
    Abeş M; Sarihan H; Madenci E
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Feb; 38(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 12596110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of local and international reference databases for forearm densitometry: different impacts on diagnostic decisions.
    Mészáros S; Berko P; Genti G; Hosszú E; Keszthelyi B; Krasznai I; Teremi F; Vargha P; Horváth C
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 17097531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation of bone mineral density among various measurement sites.
    Taechakraichana N; Limpaphayom K; Angkawanich P; Poshyachinda M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 May; 80(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 9175372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral content in newborns: validation of the technique.
    Braillon PM; Salle BL; Brunet J; Glorieux FH; Delmas PD; Meunier PJ
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Jul; 32(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 1635849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Amalgamated Reference Data for Size-Adjusted Bone Densitometry Measurements in 3598 Children and Young Adults-the ALPHABET Study.
    Crabtree NJ; Shaw NJ; Bishop NJ; Adams JE; Mughal MZ; Arundel P; Fewtrell MS; Ahmed SF; Treadgold LA; Högler W; Bebbington NA; Ward KA;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2017 Jan; 32(1):172-180. PubMed ID: 27490028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in Thai women using the Osteosys Dexxum T-bone densitometer.
    Pongchaiyakul C; Kotruchin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 23991594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae.
    Norris SA; Pettifor JM; Gray DA; Biscardi A; Buffenstein R
    J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10917741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement.
    Lai KC; Goodsitt MM; Murano R; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Mar; 50(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 1617493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.