These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10326350)

  • 1. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
    Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.
    Little C; McDonald J; Jenkins MG; McCarron P
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jun; 18(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 19661849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.
    Plassmann P; Melhuish JM; Harding KG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):50-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 7546091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of three length measurement techniques in term infants.
    Johnson TS; Engstrom JL; Haney SL; Mulcrone SL
    Pediatr Nurs; 1999; 25(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10335245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.
    Flanagan M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):28-40. PubMed ID: 14652419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
    Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
    Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
    Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
    Etris MB; Pribble J; LaBrecque J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 7546090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized planimetry versus clinical assessment for the measurement of cervical ectopia.
    Morrison CS; Bright P; Blumenthal PD; Yacobson I; Kwok C; Zdenek S; Pan Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1170-6. PubMed ID: 11349184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring healing in leg ulcers: practice considerations.
    Johnson M; Miller R
    Appl Nurs Res; 1996 Nov; 9(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8961578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers.
    Schubert V; Zander M
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 9069740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.