These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10326350)

  • 21. Reliability of wound measuring techniques in an outpatient wound center.
    Bryant JL; Brooks TL; Schmidt B; Mostow EN
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Apr; 47(4):44-51. PubMed ID: 11890088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A clinically relevant wound assessment method to monitor healing progression.
    Barber S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Mar; 54(3):42-9. PubMed ID: 18382047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An area of clinical neglect. Evaluation of healing status in wound care.
    McTaggart JH
    Prof Nurse; 1994 Jun; 9(9):600-2, 604, 606. PubMed ID: 8058807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Advances in wound photography and assessment methods.
    Ahn C; Salcido RS
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Feb; 21(2):85-93; quiz 94-5. PubMed ID: 18349736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Verge Videometer wound measurement package.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Feb 24-Mar 8; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 11033643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
    Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring wounds.
    Hanson D; Langemo D; Anderson J; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Nursing; 2007 Feb; 37(2):18, 21. PubMed ID: 17273058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of a two-dimensional footprint measurement approach.
    Reel S; Rouse S; Vernon W; Doherty P
    Sci Justice; 2010 Sep; 50(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 20709270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme.
    Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 17584345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wound healing assessment: the clinical utility of wound healing rates.
    Margolis DJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Oct; 40(8):20-2, 24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 7546097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement.
    Thomas AC; Wysocki AB
    Decubitus; 1990 Feb; 3(1):18-20, 24-5. PubMed ID: 2322408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wound shape geometry measurements correlate to eventual wound healing.
    Cardinal M; Eisenbud DE; Armstrong DG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19320884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements.
    Cutler NR; George R; Seifert RD; Brunelle R; Sramek JJ; McNeill K; Boyd WM
    Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):22-30. PubMed ID: 8286024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparisons of venous and diabetic plantar ulcer shape and area.
    Mayrovitz HN; Smith J; Ingram C
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 10326337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Evolving Field of Wound Measurement Techniques: A Literature Review.
    Khoo R; Jansen S
    Wounds; 2016 Jun; 28(6):175-81. PubMed ID: 27377609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device.
    Sprigle S; Nemeth M; Gajjala A
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 21945341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device.
    Miller C; Karimi L; Donohue L; Kapp S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 25(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 23080239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wound measurements: some tools of the trade.
    Krasner D
    Am J Nurs; 1992 May; 92(5):89-90. PubMed ID: 1590349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.