These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10327525)

  • 1. A comparison of the randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test for clinical trials with binary responses.
    Coad DS; Rosenberger WF
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(7):761-9. PubMed ID: 10327525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation.
    Coad DS; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 15706635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal adaptive designs for binary response trials.
    Rosenberger WF; Stallard N; Ivanova A; Harper CN; Ricks ML
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):909-13. PubMed ID: 11550944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing power and minimizing treatment failures in clinical trials.
    Rosenberger WF; Huc F
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 16281886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact group-sequential designs for clinical trials with randomized play-the-winner allocation.
    Stallard N; Rosenberger WF
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 11836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential urn designs with elimination for comparing K > or =3 treatments.
    Coad DS; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):1995-2009. PubMed ID: 15803441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Block response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Magirr D
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22328326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequentist performance of Bayesian inference with response-adaptive designs.
    Lecoutre B; Derzko G; Elqasyr K
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3219-31. PubMed ID: 21170916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 18375460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of number of subjects required for comparison of drug versus control in adaptive designs.
    Hu FF; Hu JH
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Sep; 29(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 11126689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal multistage designs for randomised clinical trials with continuous outcomes.
    Wason JM; Mander AP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):301-12. PubMed ID: 22139822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on sequential monitoring of select-the-winner design.
    Lan KK; Chen F; Zhong B; Shun Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):408-16. PubMed ID: 25645054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model-free tests of equality in binary data under an incomplete block design.
    Lui KJ; Zhu L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 29452049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.
    Kikuchi T; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 20223784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
    Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.