121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10328096)
1. Error identification.
Cramer SF
Am J Surg Pathol; 1999 May; 23(5):610-3. PubMed ID: 10328096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CEA assay in the follow-up of patients with extra-gastrointestinal malignancies.
Troncone L; Salvo D; La Vecchia F; Martino F; Pastore G
Bull Cancer; 1976; 63(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 1021179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Application and results of cytodiagnosis].
Bajardi F
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1970 Aug; 120(33):557-63. PubMed ID: 5534806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The general practitioner's contribution to the treatment and care of oncologic patients--meaningful possibilities from a preventive viewpoint].
van der Linde F
Med Welt; 1979 Oct; 30(41):1509-14. PubMed ID: 514030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Early and leading symptoms of malignant tumors].
Isele H
ZFA (Stuttgart); 1979 Feb; 55(4):214-21. PubMed ID: 369168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Foetal antigens and their role in the diagnosis and clinical management of human neoplasms: a review.
Laurence DJ; Neville AM
Br J Cancer; 1972 Oct; 26(5):335-55. PubMed ID: 4343676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.
Wilson RM
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7246):1352-3. PubMed ID: 10818006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensuring quality.
Garlinghouse CJ
Cancer; 1993 Aug; 72(3 Suppl):1119-24. PubMed ID: 8334667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Examples of the usefulness of tumor biological markers in the diagnosis and follow-up of various tumors].
Valladares Y
Rev Esp Oncol; 1985; 32(2):349-61. PubMed ID: 3870478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of cancer-controlling examinations].
Boyes DA; Knowélden J; Phillips AJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Jan; 99(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 4812776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical aspects of utilizing the cytological diagnostic method].
Nikitina NI; Agamova KA
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1979 Sep; (9):95-9. PubMed ID: 388047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic cytology seminar.
Frable WJ; Bonfiglio TA; Kaminsky DB; Murphy WM
Acta Cytol; 1980; 24(2):90-136. PubMed ID: 6929154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic errors in symptoms of oncologic diseases].
Linde-Stoltenberg D
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Sep; 87(9):749-57. PubMed ID: 8237071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytology. Accuracy of diagnosis.
Koss LG
Cancer; 1989 Jul; 64(1 Suppl):249-52; discussion 253-7. PubMed ID: 2720610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of primary site by examination of cancer cells in body fluids.
Murphy WM; Ng AB
Am J Clin Pathol; 1972 Nov; 58(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 4642155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cytology and cytogenetics in the early diagnosis of neoplasms].
Spriggs AI
Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1972; 78():45-56. PubMed ID: 4665682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward objective quality assurance: the eyes don't have it.
Stoler MH
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):520-2. PubMed ID: 11939724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some limitations and problems of screening for cancer.
Lilienfeld AM
Cancer; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1720-4. PubMed ID: 4835163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
