These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10329511)

  • 1. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics, II.
    Krivan V; Sikder A
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 10329511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should "handled" prey be considered? Some consequences for functional response, predator-prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory.
    Krivan V; Vrkoc I
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Mar; 227(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 14990381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of habitat fragmentation on persistence of source-sink metapopulations in systems with predators and prey or apparent competitors.
    Namba T; Umemoto A; Minami E
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Aug; 56(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 10438673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What happens when predators do not completely consume their prey?
    Mittler J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Jun; 51(3):238-51. PubMed ID: 9245778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impacts of foraging facilitation among predators on predator-prey dynamics.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2010 Jan; 72(1):94-121. PubMed ID: 19697089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.
    Krivan V
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):771-82. PubMed ID: 17926298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prey selection, vertical migrations and the impacts of harvesting upon the population dynamics of a predator-prey system.
    Edwards HJ; Dytham C; Pitchford JW; Righton D
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Aug; 69(6):1827-46. PubMed ID: 17443393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prey-dependent consumption two-prey one-predator models with stage structure for the predator and impulsive effects.
    Song X; Xiang Z
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 16797031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mechanistic model for partial preferences.
    Berec L; Krivan V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Dec; 58(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 11162787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of two diffusively coupled predator-prey populations.
    Jansen VA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Mar; 59(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11302757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A resolution of the paradox of enrichment.
    Mougi A; Nishimura K
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Sep; 248(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 17543997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral refuges and predator-prey coexistence.
    Křivan V
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Dec; 339():112-21. PubMed ID: 23291567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of handling time can destroy the coexistence of cycling predators.
    Kisdi E; Liu S
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 16405576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Species extinction and permanence of an impulsively controlled two-prey one-predator system with seasonal effects.
    Baek H
    Biosystems; 2009 Oct; 98(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 19591895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.
    Ma BO; Abrams PA; Brassil CE
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):668-84. PubMed ID: 14618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extinction and permanence of one-prey multi-predators of Holling type II function response system with impulsive biological control.
    Pei Y; Chen L; Zhang Q; Li C
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Aug; 235(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 15935168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of prey and predator feeding behaviors for trophic transfer and secondary poisoning.
    Brooks AC; Gaskell PN; Maltby LL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7916-23. PubMed ID: 19921914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey.
    Preisser EL; Bolnick DI; Grabowski JH
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 19243407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.