148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10329874)
1. Cesarean deliveries for medicaid patients: a comparison in public and private hospitals in Los Angeles county.
Gregory KD; Ramicone E; Chan L; Kahn KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1177-84. PubMed ID: 10329874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical site infection risk following cesarean deliveries covered by Medicaid or private insurance.
Yi SH; Perkins KM; Kazakova SV; Hatfield KM; Kleinbaum DG; Baggs J; Slayton RB; Jernigan JA
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 40(6):639-648. PubMed ID: 30963987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.
Bhatia M; Banerjee K; Dixit P; Dwivedi LK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2015022. PubMed ID: 32857148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of stay after childbirth in India: a comparative study of public and private health institutions.
Kumar P; Dhillon P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):181. PubMed ID: 32293327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disparities in cesarean delivery rates and associated adverse neonatal outcomes in New York City hospitals.
Lipkind HS; Duzyj C; Rosenberg TJ; Funai EF; Chavkin W; Chiasson MA
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 113(6):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 19461418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variation in vaginal breech delivery rates by hospital type.
Gregory KD; Korst LM; Krychman M; Cane P; Platt LD
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 11239642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.
Misra A
Matern Child Health J; 2008 Mar; 12(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 17549614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer.
Henke RM; Wier LM; Marder WD; Friedman BS; Wong HS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Nov; 14():387. PubMed ID: 25406813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008.
Hopkins K; de Lima Amaral EF; Mourão AN
Birth; 2014 Jun; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 24684250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States.
Sakai-Bizmark R; Ross MG; Estevez D; Bedel LEM; Marr EH; Tsugawa Y
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e212235. PubMed ID: 33739430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of organizational factors on the cesarean delivery occurrence in a low-risk population].
Duvillier C; Rousseau A; Bouyer C; Goffinet F; Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Nov; 46(10-11):706-712. PubMed ID: 30318361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR
Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil.
Almeida Sd; Bettiol H; Barbieri MA; Silva AA; Ribeiro VS
Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 24(12):2909-18. PubMed ID: 19082282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
Vieira GO; Fernandes LG; de Oliveira NF; Silva LR; Vieira Tde O
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():132. PubMed ID: 26043857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship of hospital ownership and teaching status to 30- and 180-day adjusted mortality rates.
Kuhn EM; Hartz AJ; Krakauer H; Bailey RC; Rimm AA
Med Care; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1098-108. PubMed ID: 7967851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Case-mix adjusted odds ratios as an alternative way to compare hospital performances.
Capon A; Di Lallo D; Perucci CA; Panepuccia L
Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 16121758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does medical insurance type (private vs public) influence the physician's decision to perform Caesarean delivery?
Movsas TZ; Wells E; Mongoven A; Grigorescu V
J Med Ethics; 2012 Aug; 38(8):470-3. PubMed ID: 22562949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicaid-dependent hospitals and their patients: how have they fared?
Dranove D; White WD
Health Serv Res; 1998 Jun; 33(2 Pt 1):163-85. PubMed ID: 9618666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012.
Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
