These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10331376)

  • 1. GM advisory panel is slanted, say critics.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):7. PubMed ID: 10331376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GM crops and the pesticide paradigm.
    Welsh R; Hubbell B; Ervin DE; Jahn M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 12042850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biotechnology. A first step, but still a long way to go.
    Berlfein J
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):365. PubMed ID: 1861711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The real curse of Frankenfood.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):113. PubMed ID: 10052332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of biotechnology.
    Gore A; Owens S
    Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A need to reinvent biotechnology regulation at the EPA.
    Miller HI
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5192):1815-8. PubMed ID: 7997875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EPA, critics soften stance on pesticidal plants.
    Hagmann M
    Science; 1999 Apr; 284(5412):249. PubMed ID: 10232969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US academy study finds GM foods are safe...but critics claim the panel was biased.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):693. PubMed ID: 10783856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US sends mixed message in GM debate...as questions emerge over cost-effectiveness.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):298. PubMed ID: 10432097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulating biotechnology.
    McGarity TO
    Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.