These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10331617)

  • 21. Adaptation to loudness and environmental stimuli in three newly fitted hearing aid users.
    Lindley GA; Palmer CV; Durrant J; Pratt S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jun; 11(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10858003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.
    Wesselkamp M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kiessling J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):73-5. PubMed ID: 11318489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM; Trevino AC; Gombert JN; Liebig-Trehearn L; Kopun JG; Jesteadt W; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1899-913. PubMed ID: 25920842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection].
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Wagner I
    HNO; 1994 Jun; 42(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 8071095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hellman RP; Meiselman CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2596-606. PubMed ID: 2283432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling.
    Brand T; Hohmann V
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 11409767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can maximum comfortable loudness levels in hearing impaired listeners be predicted from ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds recorded with high frequency probes?
    Rawool VW
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 11409793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of a portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compensation.
    Hidaka H; Kawase T; Takahashi S; Suzuki Y; Ozawa K; Sakamoto S; Sasaki N; Hirano K; Ueda N; Sone T; Takasaka T
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9832405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Verifying loudness perception after hearing aid fitting.
    Cox RM; Gray GA
    Am J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 10(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11808725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
    Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2281-7. PubMed ID: 8730074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.