These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10331913)

  • 1. Biomechanical performance of orthopedic gloves.
    Jackson EM; Neal JG; Williams FM; Stern CA; Suber F; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 10331913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical performance of latex and non-latex double-glove systems.
    Fisher MD; Reddy VR; Williams FM; Lin KY; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(6):797-806. PubMed ID: 10556843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ease of donning of new powder-free non-latex and latex double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 14510282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical performance of examination gloves.
    Jackson EM; Williams FM; Neal JG; Suber F; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 10421703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG; McGregor W
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12825744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of a new double glove hole detection system in the Emergency Department.
    Fisher MD; O'Keefe JS; Williams FM; Neal JG; Syverud SA; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 10331914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and performance of innovative surgical double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 14510280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment of accidental exposure of surgeons to blood during orthopedic surgery. Are we safe in surgical gloves?
    Timler D; Bończak O; Jończyk J; Iltchev P; Sliwczyński A; Marczak M
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 24738527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies of determinants of glove hole puncture during electrosurgery.
    Neal JG; London SD; Kheir JN; Hunter FP; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 8953394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resistance of double-glove hole puncture indication systems to surgical needle puncture.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 14510281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Update on the Innovative Surgical Double-Glove Hole Puncture Indication Systems: Reliability and Performance.
    Edlich R; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(2-4):339-353. PubMed ID: 29773048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical performance of powder-free examination gloves.
    Fisher MD; Reddy VR; Williams FM; Lin KY; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 10595890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].
    Jensen SL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 12645406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perforation rate using a single pair of orthopedic gloves vs. a double pair of gloves in obstetric cases.
    Turnquest MA; How HY; Allen SA; Voss DH; Spinnato JA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):362-5. PubMed ID: 8972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can double gloves improve surgeon-patient barrier efficiency?
    Sadat-Ali M; Al-Habdan I; AlBluwi M; Corea JR; Al-Othman A; Shriyan D; Moussa M; AlDhakheel D; AlOmran A
    Int Surg; 2006; 91(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 16845861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology: prevention with cut-resistant gloves.
    Kelly KE; Lee KC; Tami TA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Jan; 108(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 8437881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.
    Tanner J; Parkinson H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (3):CD003087. PubMed ID: 12137673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Glove perforation in surgery and protective effect of double gloves].
    de Castro-Peraza ME; Garzón-Rodríguez E; Rodríguez-Pérez V; Sosa-Alvarez I; Gutierrez-Hernández J; Asiain-Ugarte C
    Enferm Clin; 2010; 20(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 20116312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Needlestick fluid transmission through surgical gloves of the same thickness.
    Din SU; Tidley MG
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Jan; 64(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 24265256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of chlorination, thickness, and moisture on glove donning efficiency.
    Preece D; Hong Ng T; Tong HK; Lewis R; Carré MJ
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 33843479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.