These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10332335)

  • 1. Using clinical audit in practice: a pilot peer review project.
    Holt VP; Earp DP
    Prim Dent Care; 1996 Sep; 3(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 10332335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linking clinical audit in general dental services to primary care trust clinical governance -- progress report of an approach used in Southend.
    Cannell P
    Prim Dent Care; 2005 Jan; 12(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15703157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the end user (dentist) experience of undertaking clinical audit in a PCT-led NHS Modernisation Agency pilot scheme.
    Cannell PJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Oct; 16(4):168-76. PubMed ID: 19796520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality in paediatric anaesthesia: a pilot study of interdepartmental peer review.
    Crean PM; Stokes MA; Williamson C; Hatch DJ
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Jun; 58(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 12846618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A report of an evaluation of the pilot peer review scheme for general dental practitioners working in the general dental services in England.
    Eaton KA; Fleming WG; Rich JL
    Br Dent J; 1998 Feb; 184(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 9549915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pilot study of six Colorado dental hygiene independent practices.
    Astroth DB; Cross-Poline GN
    J Dent Hyg; 1998; 72(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9495190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enthusiastic welcome for the pilot peer review scheme for GDPs working in the GDS.
    Pendlebury M
    Br Dent J; 1998 Feb; 184(4):175. PubMed ID: 9549912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposal for practice nurse appraisal: report of a pilot project.
    Horman L; Hellens J; Baker M
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 25625835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of dental practice record-keeping: a PCT-coordinated clinical audit by Worcestershire dentists.
    Cole A; McMichael A
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Jul; 16(3):85-93. PubMed ID: 19566980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A role for clinical audit and peer review in the identification of continuing professional development needs for general dental practitioners: a discussion.
    Bullock AD; Butterfield S; Belfield CR; Morris ZS; Ribbins PM; Frame JW
    Br Dent J; 2000 Oct; 189(8):445-8. PubMed ID: 11093394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental practice review in Ontario.
    O'Keefe JP
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Mar; 64(3):200, 203. PubMed ID: 9558814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the perceived effects on Scottish general dental practitioners of peer review and other continuing professional development.
    Maidment Y
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16732252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revalidation of general dental practitioners in Scotland: the results of a pilot study. Part 2 - acceptability to practitioners.
    Maidment YG; Rennie JS; Thomas M
    Br Dent J; 2006 Apr; 200(8):455-8; discussion 445. PubMed ID: 16703042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project.
    Aveling EL; Martin G; Jiménez García S; Martin L; Herbert G; Armstrong N; Dixon-Woods M; Woolhouse I
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Dec; 21(12):1034-41. PubMed ID: 22879446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Putting the pilot scheme into practice.
    Lester V
    Br Dent J; 1993 Apr; 174(8):267-8. PubMed ID: 8476674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists.
    Bowie P; McKay J; Murray L; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 19019097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nursing clinical supervision project in a Neonatal Intensive Care and a Special Care Baby Unit: a best practice implementation project.
    Johansson D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Apr; 13(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 26447058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revalidation of general dental practitioners in Scotland: the results of a pilot study. Part 1--feasibility of operation.
    Maidment YG; Rennie JS; Thomas M
    Br Dent J; 2006 Apr; 200(7):399-402, discussion 389. PubMed ID: 16607333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
    Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.