153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10332375)
1. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results.
Maneenut C; Tyas MJ
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):739-43. PubMed ID: 8935118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions.
Neo J; Chew CL; Yap A; Sidhu S
Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 9002808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
van Dijken JW
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
