These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10333685)

  • 1. The effects of design and configuration on the biomechanical response of an internal spinal fixator.
    Alkalay RN; Sharpe D; Bader DL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10333685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical analysis of an instrumented spinal fixator under torsional loads.
    Alkalay RN; Sharpe D; Bader DL
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 15713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Schultheiss M; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Claes LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 11246374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical comparison of two external fixator clamp designs.
    Kraus KH; Wotton HM; Rand WM
    Vet Surg; 1998; 27(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 9605234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
    Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [In-vitro measurement of loading using an instrumented vertebral internal fixator].
    Rohlmann A; Eick O; Bergmann G; Graichen F
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 7754660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical studies of the anterior spinal fixators after corpectomy in pigs.
    Chen PQ; Wu CM; Jao WT; Shih CM; Cheng CK
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Jan; 90(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 1679113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical performance of Ilizarov circular external fixators in comparison with other external fixators.
    Podolsky A; Chao EY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):61-70. PubMed ID: 8339510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.
    Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
    Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fixation stiffness of Dynafix unilateral external fixator in neutral and non-neutral configurations.
    Koo TK; Chao EY; Mak AF
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 16308459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of the Cotrel-Dubousset spine internal fixator in different load conditions.
    Guglielmino E; La Rosa G; Russo TC
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 8490533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clamping stiffness and its influence on load distribution between paired internal spinal fixation devices.
    Rohlmann A; Calisse J; Bergmann G; Radvan J; Mayer HM
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Jun; 9(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 8854279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biomechanical considerations concerning the use of internal fixator systems in spinal interventions].
    Steffen R; Nolte LP; Jergas M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 7754659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stress measurements with an instrumented internal spinal fixator].
    Rohlmann A; Eick O; Bergmann G; Graichen F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1993 Oct; 38(10):255-9. PubMed ID: 8268404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
    Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical stability of lateral interbody implants and supplemental fixation in a cadaveric degenerative spondylolisthesis model.
    Fogel GR; Turner AW; Dooley ZA; Cornwall GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):E1138-46. PubMed ID: 24979274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.