These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10333827)

  • 1. Compulsory HIV tests.
    Dunn RW
    CMAJ; 1999 May; 160(9):1286-7. PubMed ID: 10333827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of voluntary prenatal and routine newborn HIV screening.
    AIDS Read; 2001 Feb; 11(2):81. PubMed ID: 11279876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine screening for HIV infection in booked antenatal women: how justified in developing countries?
    Ibekwe PC; Ikeme AC
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2001 Aug; 5(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 12471908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voluntary screening program for HIV in pregnancy. Cost effectiveness.
    Rivera-Alsina ME; Rivera CC; Rollene N; Kirby RS; Ayres A; McNamara M
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Mar; 46(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 11304866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of HIV screening in pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in India.
    Kumar M; Birch S; Maturana A; Gafni A
    Health Policy; 2006 Jul; 77(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 16126300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guiding principles for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing of women during pregnancy--2002.
    Territorial Advisory Committee on AIDS, a Committee of The Federal/Provincial Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2002 Jul; 28(13):105-8. PubMed ID: 12109053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine screening for HIV infection in pregnant women: a highly justified component of antenatal care in developing countries.
    Chukwuali LI
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2003 Aug; 7(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 14677306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talking about HIV.
    Keystone D
    CMAJ; 1998 Oct; 159(8):920-1. PubMed ID: 9834712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness estimates for antenatal HIV testing in the Netherlands.
    Rozenbaum MH; Verweel G; Folkerts DK; Dronkers F; van den Hoek JA; Hartwig NG; de Groot R; Postma MJ
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Oct; 19(10):668-75. PubMed ID: 18824618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antenatal screening for HIV infection is improving in London.
    Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly; 2000 Feb; 10(8):69. PubMed ID: 10736949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HIV awareness during pregnancy.
    Gosling I; Grimwood K; Dickson N
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jul; 113(1114):321-2. PubMed ID: 10972316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antenatal screening for HIV in Australia: time to revise policies?
    Ziegler JB
    Med J Aust; 1999 Aug; 171(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 10494237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HIV testing in pregnancy.
    Ward C
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Feb; 2(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 10358654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antenatal screening for HIV.
    Bramley D; Graves N
    N Z Med J; 2002 Jan; 115(1146):24. PubMed ID: 11936333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rational use of the HIV antibody test.
    Dwyer JM; Stewart GJ; McDonald P
    Med J Aust; 1993 Mar; 158(5):327-8. PubMed ID: 8474374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pharmaco-economic evaluation of mandatory HIV-screening in pregnancy; a cost-efficacy analysis in Amsterdam].
    Postma MJ; van den Hoek JA; Beck EJ; Heeg B; Jager JC; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Apr; 144(16):749-54. PubMed ID: 10812443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine hepatitis C virus screening in pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Plunkett BA; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 15846195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Would universal antenatal screening for HIV infection be cost-effective in a setting of very low prevalence? Modelling the data for Australia.
    Graves N; Walker DG; McDonald AM; Kaldor JM; Ziegler JB
    J Infect Dis; 2004 Jul; 190(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 15195257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ontario joins prenatal HIV-screening movement.
    Silversides A
    CMAJ; 1999 Jan; 160(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 9951433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 2008 New Jersey legislation for HIV testing of pregnant women and newborns.
    Paul SM; Dimasi LG
    MD Advis; 2008; 1(2):6, 8-9. PubMed ID: 21826044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.