BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10333882)

  • 1. A modification to enable controlled progressive advancement of the Twin Block appliance.
    Carmichael GJ; Banks PA; Chadwick SM
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Mar; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10333882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular protraction appliance IV.
    Coelho Filho CM
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Jan; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 11314525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modification of the twin block technique for patients with a deep bite.
    Mahony DR; Witzig J
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(2):4-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10613126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Dynamax system: a new orthopaedic appliance and case report.
    Bass NM
    J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 33(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16751429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bite jumping with the Functional Mandibular Advancer.
    Kinzinger GS; Diedrich PR
    J Clin Orthod; 2005 Dec; 39(12):696-700; quiz 715. PubMed ID: 16456305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preliminary report of a new design of cast metal fixed twin-block appliance.
    Qi J; Tan ZR; He H; Pan D; Yeweng SJ
    J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 34(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 18042821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of a Overjet and Overbite In Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Case Report.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A; Sharma S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):19-22. PubMed ID: 27029087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transitional Twin Block.
    Broadbent JM
    Funct Orthod; 1997; 14(3):4-8, 10-6. PubMed ID: 9610291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential MARA-Invisalign treatment.
    Eckhart JE
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Jul; 43(7):439-48; quiz 459. PubMed ID: 19684365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The twin block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Gill D; Sharma A; Naini F; Jones S
    Dent Update; 2005 Apr; 32(3):158-60, 163-4, 167-8. PubMed ID: 15881511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twin-block re-activation.
    Brennan JA; Littlewood SJ
    J Orthod; 2006 Mar; 33(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 16514128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An abstract: Technique and philosophy for the treatment of Class II skeletal and dental malocclusions.
    Willis LM
    J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1999 Dec; 16(4):4-11. PubMed ID: 10825852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy.
    Schaefer AT; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15224053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and management of Twin Blocks: reflections after 30 years of clinical use.
    Clark W
    J Orthod; 2010 Sep; 37(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 20805350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.