These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10334559)

  • 1. Meta-analyses of published results are unreliable.
    Buyse M; Carlson RW; Piedbois P
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1646-7. PubMed ID: 10334559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
    Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Meta-analyses of the effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer: the ultimate evidence?].
    Fourquet A; Kirova Y; Bollet MA; Tournat H; Dendale R; Campana F
    Cancer Radiother; 2008 Nov; 12(6-7):554-8. PubMed ID: 18838328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biphosphonates in breast cancer--based on a Cochrane meta-analysis].
    Junker N; Nielsen DL; Kamby C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Sep; 169(37):3108-11. PubMed ID: 17877961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Popat S; Smith IE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(11):858; author reply 858-9. PubMed ID: 15928308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials for rare harmful cardiovascular events: the case of rosiglitazone.
    Hernandez AV; Walker E; Ioannidis JP; Kattan MW
    Am Heart J; 2008 Jul; 156(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18585493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [About standard: from rule to patient. Breast cancer as an example].
    Vennin P; Taïeb S; Carpentier P
    Bull Cancer; 2001 Feb; 88(2):221-2. PubMed ID: 11257598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?
    Kiter E; Karatosun V; Günal I
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12721685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
    Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments.
    Pignon JP; Auperin A; Borget I; Hill C
    Lung Cancer; 2009 Jul; 65(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19059671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials.
    Mehta RS; Schubbert T
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):680; author reply 680-1. PubMed ID: 18445822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
    Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analysis or large randomized trial, that is the question].
    Pignon JP
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1998 Jan; 22(1):109-10. PubMed ID: 9762182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
    Weinmann S
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.