These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10335018)

  • 1. Short forms of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) for self- and collateral ratings: development, reliability, and validity.
    Harlan E; Clark LA
    Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 10335018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF).
    Kotelnikova Y; Clark LA; Vernon PA; Hayden EP
    Assessment; 2015 Feb; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24847163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): temporal stability and predictive validity of the diagnostic scales.
    Melley AH; Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E
    Assessment; 2002 Jun; 9(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12066833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.
    Wolf EJ; Harrington KM; Miller MW
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):911-24. PubMed ID: 21767029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).
    Calabrese WR; Rudick MM; Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 22250598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality for Youth (SNAP-Y): a new measure for assessing adolescent personality and personality pathology.
    Linde JA; Stringer D; Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):387-404. PubMed ID: 23794180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP).
    Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Mar; 17(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 15769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparability of self- and other-rated personality structure.
    Nuzum H; Ready RE; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Jun; 31(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 30730190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The NEO-FFI in Multiple Sclerosis: internal consistency, factorial validity, and correspondence between self and informant reports.
    Schwartz ES; Chapman BP; Duberstein PR; Weinstock-Guttman B; Benedict RH
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20484711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing Two Alternative Pathological Personality Measures in the Assessment of Psychopathy: An Examination of the Snap and DAPP-BQ.
    Pryor LR; Miller JD; Gaughan ET
    J Pers Disord; 2009 Feb; 23(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 19267664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations in a clinically depressed sample: factor structure, personality correlates, and prediction of distress.
    McWilliams LA; Cox BJ; Enns MW
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Apr; 59(4):423-37. PubMed ID: 12652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity.
    Verheul R; Andrea H; Berghout CC; Dolan C; Busschbach JJ; van der Kroft PJ; Bateman AW; Fonagy P
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 18315396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between self- and peer ratings of interpersonal problems.
    Hill RW; Zrull MC; McIntire K
    Assessment; 1998 Mar; 5(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 9458343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric adequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the Personality Assessment Inventory.
    Frazier TW; Naugle RI; Haggerty KA
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Sep; 18(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 16953735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Traits associated with personality disorders and adjustment to military life: predictive validity of self and peer reports.
    Fiedler ER; Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E
    Mil Med; 2004 Mar; 169(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 15080240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. NEO Personality Inventory. Interpersonal Adjective Scales.
    Kurtz JE; Lee PA; Sherker JL
    Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 10335016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using adapted short MASTs for assessing parental alcoholism: reliability and validity.
    Crews TM; Sher KJ
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1992 Jun; 16(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 1626659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary appraisal of infertility: evaluation of the psychometric properties of a Greek version of the Appraisal of Life Events scale (ALE) in a Sample of infertile women undergoing fertility treatment.
    Gourounti K; Anagnostopoulos F; Vaslamatzis G
    Women Health; 2010 Oct; 50(7):688-704. PubMed ID: 21104570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parental assessment of childhood social phobia: psychometric properties of the social phobia and anxiety inventory for children-parent report.
    Higa CK; Fernandez SN; Nakamura BJ; Chorpita BF; Daleiden EL
    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 35(4):590-7. PubMed ID: 17007605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.