These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10336065)

  • 1. Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 10336065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study on suppression of otoacoustic emissions: lateral domain.
    Oliveira JR; Fernandes CF; Costa Filho OA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 22030959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Maurer J; Hinni M; Beck A; Mann W
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Mar; 112(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 7870435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Andéol G; Gallégo S; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 10675639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1998 Mar; 117(1-2):114-8. PubMed ID: 9557982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural Interaction Effects of 30-50 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.
    Gransier R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e305-e315. PubMed ID: 28358747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency analysis of the contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by narrow-band noise.
    Norman M; Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Aug; 27(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8312851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions by harmonic complex tones in humans.
    Micheyl C; Maison S; Carlyon RP; Andéol G; Collet L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):293-305. PubMed ID: 9921656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
    Franz B; Altidis P; Altidis B
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve.
    Chang MY; Song JJ; Kim JS; Koo JW
    Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.
    Ferber-Viart C; Duclaux R; Collet L; Guyonnard F
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun; 57(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 7652027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS; Carvalho RM
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.