144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10336702)
1. Female mating behaviour, sexual selection and chromosome I inversion karyotype in the seaweed fly, coelopa frigida.
Gilburn AS; Day TH
Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Apr; 82 (Pt 3)():276-81. PubMed ID: 10336702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GENETIC CORRELATION BETWEEN A FEMALE MATING PREFERENCE AND THE PREFERRED MALE CHARACTER IN SEAWEED FLIES (COELOPA FRIGIDA).
Gilburn AS; Foster SP; Day TH
Evolution; 1993 Dec; 47(6):1788-1795. PubMed ID: 28568002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female mate choice for large males in several species of seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae).
Crean CS; Dunn DW; Day TH; Gilburn AS
Anim Behav; 2000 Jan; 59(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 10640374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of an inversion system and the time interval between matings on postcopulatory sexual selection in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida.
Blyth JE; Gilburn AS
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Aug; 95(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 15999137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Male choice, willingness to mate and body size in seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae).
Dunn DW; Crean CS; Wilson CL; Gilburn AS
Anim Behav; 1999 Apr; 57(4):847-853. PubMed ID: 10202092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic differences in mating success and female choice in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida).
Engelhard G; Foster SP; Day TH
Heredity (Edinb); 1989 Feb; 62 ( Pt 1)():123-31. PubMed ID: 2732083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly, Coelopa ursina (Diptera: Coelopidae).
Crean CS; Gilburn AS
Anim Behav; 1998 Dec; 56(6):1405-1410. PubMed ID: 9933537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male-specific genotype by environment interactions influence viability selection acting on a sexually selected inversion system in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida.
Edward DA; Gilburn AS
Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 23289580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka.
Howard RD; Martens RS; Innis SA; Drnevich JM; Hale J
Anim Behav; 1998 May; 55(5):1151-63. PubMed ID: 9632501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct benefits of choosing a high-fitness mate can offset the indirect costs associated with intralocus sexual conflict.
Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1710-1718. PubMed ID: 28369895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. INTERSEXUAL SELECTION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY: DOES FEMALE CHOICE ENHANCE FITNESS?
Whittier TS; Kaneshiro KY
Evolution; 1995 Oct; 49(5):990-996. PubMed ID: 28564862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intercontinental karyotype-environment parallelism supports a role for a chromosomal inversion in local adaptation in a seaweed fly.
Mérot C; Berdan EL; Babin C; Normandeau E; Wellenreuther M; Bernatchez L
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Jun; 285(1881):. PubMed ID: 29925615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males.
Dougherty LR
Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 36998999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish.
Godin JG; Auld HL
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 23919148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
Höbel G
J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
