These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10337246)

  • 1. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis.
    Auger TA; Turley PK
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 10337246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century.
    Yehezkel S; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 15067255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century.
    Nguyen DD; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 9714286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles.
    Sutter RE; Turley PK
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9851345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balanced angular profile analysis.
    Rhee SC; Kang SR; Park HS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):535-44. PubMed ID: 15277828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males.
    Zylinski CG; Nanda RS; Kapila S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 1598891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects.
    Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The facial soft tissue profile of the southern Chinese: prosthodontic considerations.
    Chiu CS; Clark RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):839-50. PubMed ID: 1432812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "Central Tendency Bias" in the assessment of facial attractiveness in group-based and individual ratings-A survey-based study in 727 volunteers.
    Alfertshofer M; Kempa J; Biesman BS; Knoedler S; Knoedler L; Bravo C; Davidovic K; Antoszewski B; Timler W; Kasielska-Trojan A; Cotofana S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 May; 92():264-275. PubMed ID: 38582052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various facial angles and measurements on the ideal position of the nasal tip in the Asian patient population.
    Choi JY; Park JH; Javidnia H; Sykes JM
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013; 15(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 23948870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Variation in the assessment of facial aesthetics of women during the past 150 years].
    Kuitert RB; Aydin B
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2020 Dec; 127(12):683-689. PubMed ID: 33367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.