These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10338028)

  • 1. On selecting a body surface mapping procedure.
    Hoekema R; Uijen GJ; van Oosterom A
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Apr; 32(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 10338028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Body surface potential mapping system].
    Tsunakawa H; Nishiyama G
    Nihon Rinsho; 1995 Jan; 53(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7897843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Body surface electrocardiographic mapping: methods for data presentation and diagnosis of myocardial infarction by departure map].
    Kubota I
    Nihon Rinsho; 1994 Jul; 52 Suppl(Pt 1):689-96. PubMed ID: 12436603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential mapping in myocardial infarction and left ventricular hypertrophy.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Donnelly MP; Black ND
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 18433618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplemented standard 12-lead electrocardiogram for optimal diagnosis and reconstruction of significant body surface map patterns.
    Kornreich F; MacLeod RS; Lux RL
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 18433616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of lead selection methods for optimal reconstruction of body surface potentials.
    Guillem MS; Castells F; Climent AM; Bodí V; Chorro FJ; Millet J
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17889899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How many leads are necessary for a reliable reconstruction of surface potentials during atrial fibrillation?
    Guillem Mde L; Bollmann A; Climent AM; Husser D; Millet-Roig J; Castells F
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 19423429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epicardial potential distribution reconstruction from recordings of intravenous and transthoracic mapping catheters: a feasibility study.
    Yilmaz B
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):937-45. PubMed ID: 17110153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the 24-lead "standard" electrocardiogram to identify the site of acute coronary occlusion. A review paper.
    Wagner GS; Pahlm-Webb U; Pahlm O
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 18433615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Composition of approximated body-surface-potential-maps by utilizing a common 12-lead-ECG device.
    Koch H; Richter A; Kürsten R; Zabel M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 15759576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential mapping: a sequential selection based approach.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Donnelly MP; Lux RL; McCullagh PJ; Black ND
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 16503972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relationship between reference point potential and potential distribution of normal electrocardial field on the thoracic surface of healthy individuals].
    Li BF; Zhou X
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Aug; 28(9):1640-1, 1645. PubMed ID: 18819887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Substrate mapping vs. tachycardia mapping using CARTO in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia: impact on outcome of catheter ablation.
    Volkmer M; Ouyang F; Deger F; Ernst S; Goya M; Bänsch D; Berodt K; Kuck KH; Antz M
    Europace; 2006 Nov; 8(11):968-76. PubMed ID: 17043071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential solutions for providing standard electrocardiogram recordings from nonstandard recording sites.
    Pahlm O; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 18433611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lead selection: old and new methods for locating the most electrocardiogram information.
    Donnelly MP; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Black ND
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 18433617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity- and effort-gain analysis: multilead ECG electrode array selection for activation time imaging.
    Hintermüller C; Seger M; Pfeifer B; Fischer G; Modre R; Tilg B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2055-66. PubMed ID: 17019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appraisal of BSPM obtained from the limited lead system.
    Sobieszczanska M; Jagielski J; Nowak B; Pilecki W; Kalka D
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2007 Jul; 7 Suppl 1():11-3. PubMed ID: 17584669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroanatomic characterization of post-infarct scars comparison with 3-dimensional myocardial scar reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Codreanu A; Odille F; Aliot E; Marie PY; Magnin-Poull I; Andronache M; Mandry D; Djaballah W; Régent D; Felblinger J; de Chillou C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 52(10):839-42. PubMed ID: 18755347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Importance and problems of diagnostic criteria of body surface mapping].
    Yasui S; Akutsu A; Suzuki A; Watanabe T
    Nihon Rinsho; 1995 Jan; 53(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 7897834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardizing electrocardiographic leads: introduction to a symposium.
    Drew B; Kligfield P
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 18433610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.