274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10338829)
1. Can it be--Pete Stark, the doctor's pal?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Stark P
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10338829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the GOP have "Medicare madness"?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Vladeck B
Med Econ; 1995 Jul; 72(13):121-2, 127-8, 130 passim. PubMed ID: 10143921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the Stark law necessary? An interview with a health law expert. Interview by Joan Naper.
Gaynor JM
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Oct; 14(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10152541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Centers for medicare and medicaid now scrutinizing leasing arrangements.
Travis NL; Wool HS; Chananie SJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):683-5. PubMed ID: 17903751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules.
Portman RM; Lisa GC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices.
Larios D; Meyer A
Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stark II: the quagmire thickens.
Ivers D
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers.
Riley JB; Pristave RJ
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Specialty hospitals: Congress should act to level the playing field.
Grassley C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):13. PubMed ID: 16075770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scheduling difficulties.
Olsen GG
Rehab Manag; 2003 Mar; 16(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 12741251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are cardiac-catheterization services Stark designated health services?
Becker S; Kannensohn K
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Aug; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10173889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II.
Katayama AC
WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CMS shines up its 'shoes'. Stark revisions ease tensions on self-referrals.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(34):17. PubMed ID: 18800481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The players have changed, but is the game the same?
Gardner J; Hallam K
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jan; 31(3):44-6. PubMed ID: 11418947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers?
Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM
J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-referral Q&A. Stark II expands federal restrictions on physician referral practices.
Barton HM
Tex Med; 1995 Feb; 91(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 7701439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
