1148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10338923)
21. Medicare HMO exodus: system correction or prediction?
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 1999; 25(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 10387278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Washington forecast: much talk. Any action?
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 2001 May; 78(10):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 11409267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. NAHC's panel on HMOs & home care. Part 3: Regulatory considerations for HMOs and home care.
Hercenberg J
Caring; 1986 May; 5(5):51-3. PubMed ID: 10300866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Perspectives 2001: a Medicare odyssey to the world of competitive pricing?
Clemmitt M
Med Health; 2000 Dec; 54(48):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 11139905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The players have changed, but is the game the same?
Gardner J; Hallam K
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jan; 31(3):44-6. PubMed ID: 11418947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Shaping the future of American medicine.
Roper WL
Ala J Med Sci; 1988 Oct; 25(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 3064624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Outlook '03. Even with unrelenting cost increases, some sectors enjoy a healthier prognosis. But the year promises formidable challenges for all.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jan; 33(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 12545526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Health Policy Report. The future of HMOs.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1982 Aug; 307(7):451-6. PubMed ID: 7045674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Managed care: what to expect as Medicare-HMO enrollment grows. 1.
Butler RN; Sherman FT; Rhinehart E; Klein S; Rother JC
Geriatrics; 1996 Oct; 51(10):35-42. PubMed ID: 8863756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Market dynamics. Part I: Managed care.
Cochrane JD
Integr Healthc Rep; 1999 Jul; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 10558060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Home care coverage through HMOs.
Dombi W
Caring; 1993 Jun; 12(6):58-60. PubMed ID: 10125996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. HMO mergers and Medicare: the antitrust issues.
Feldman R; Given RS
Health Econ; 1998 Mar; 7(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 9565174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.
Manchikanti L; Giordano J
Pain Physician; 2007 Sep; 10(5):607-26. PubMed ID: 17876359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perspectives. PROs: modification and expansion.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Aug; 39(33):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10300446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Despite recent profitability, future portends lean years for HMOs.
Baumgarten A
Manag Care Q; 2003; 11(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 14983650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Where it was, where it is, and where it should go. Historical perspectives of healthcare policy and the evolution of a new model for healthcare delivery.
Ball AM
Cost Qual Q J; 1998 Dec; 4(4):7-18. PubMed ID: 10351393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medicare and HMOs: a first look, with disturbing findings.
Heinz J
Caring; 1987 Jul; 6(7):15-8. PubMed ID: 10301847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. HMOs rule in Boston market. But costs, utilization are high.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 1998 Sep; 28(37):56-8, 60-2, 64-5. PubMed ID: 10183094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of data on the U.S. health sector. June 2003.
Hellander I
Int J Health Serv; 2003; 33(4):835-55. PubMed ID: 14758863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A track record. When it comes to assuring quality and protecting consumers, HMOs have an established track record.
Carneal G
HMO; 1995; 36(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 10153116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]