These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10339133)
1. Perspectives. Regulation run amok? Stark II proposal draws cacophony of comment. Havighurst C Med Health; 1998 Aug; 52(33):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10339133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stark II and physician compensation models: integrating business and legal issues. Pursell D; Marsh J; Thompson D; Potter K J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 15968939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions. Shay AW; Murphy SL Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician incentive plan rule: reevaluating physician compensation arrangements. Gauvreau E Manag Care Interface; 1997 Sep; 10(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 10175545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposed Stark II rules: clarification or more confusion? Shay A; Francesconi G J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):95-113. PubMed ID: 10186240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships. Avery PA; Wachler AB Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The final Stark II rule: implications for hospital-physician arrangements. Melvin DH; Polacheck JF Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):62-6. PubMed ID: 11588869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility. Chase L Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some Stark facts about rules governing referrals within groups. Caesar NB Manag Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):51-2. PubMed ID: 10141793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Group practice structure and compensation plans under Stark II regulations. Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2001 May; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 11398740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stark II: the quagmire thickens. Ivers D J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage? Manchikanti L; McMahon EB Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not knowing the Stark lab rules can cost you big. Pretzer M Med Econ; 1996 Jan; 73(1):91-2, 94, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10153938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stark has softer touch in new regs. Ivers D J Ark Med Soc; 2001 Nov; 98(5):141-7. PubMed ID: 11685807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stark II proposed regulations. Impacting group practices and physician employers. Wachler AB; Avery PA Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10179373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare program; physician self-referral regulations: change in date for submission of group attestation statement--HCFA. Final rule--technical amendment. Fed Regist; 1995 Dec; 60(237):63438-40. PubMed ID: 10153534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]