These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10339366)

  • 1. Permeate Flux in Crossflow Ultrafiltration under Intermediate Pressures.
    Song L
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Jun; 214(2):251-263. PubMed ID: 10339366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions.
    Hong S; Faibish RS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1997 Dec; 196(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 9792752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration.
    Broens F; Menne D; Pothof I; Blankert B; Roesink HD; Futselaar H; Lammertink RG; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1113-20. PubMed ID: 22227242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of permeate flux during osmotic pressure-controlled electric field-enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration.
    Sarkar B; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Mar; 319(1):236-46. PubMed ID: 18068719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling of the Permeate Flux during Microfiltration of BSA-Adsorbed Microspheres in a Stirred Cell.
    Choi SW; Yoon JY; Haam S; Jung JK; Kim JH; Kim WS
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Aug; 228(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 10926466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part.
    Cojocaru C; Zakrzewska-Trznadel G; Miskiewicz A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 19414217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concentration Polarization of Interacting Solute Particles in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration.
    Bhattacharjee S; Kim AS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Apr; 212(1):81-99. PubMed ID: 10072278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure and flux profiles in bead-filled ultrafiltration/microfiltration hollow fiber membrane modules.
    Dai XP; Luo RG; Sirkar KK
    Biotechnol Prog; 2000; 16(6):1044-54. PubMed ID: 11101333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of polysaccharides produced by fermentation using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system.
    Brou A; Jaffrin MY; Ding LH; Courtois J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 May; 82(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 12632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Purification of densonucleosis virus by tangential flow ultrafiltration.
    Grzenia DL; Carlson JO; Czermak P; Han B; Specht RK; Wickramasinghe SR
    Biotechnol Prog; 2006; 22(5):1346-53. PubMed ID: 17022673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line removal of volatile fatty acids from CELSS anaerobic bioreactor via nanofiltration.
    Colon G; Sager JC
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 2001; 7(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11676457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pilot scale nanofiltration membrane separation for waste management in textile industry.
    Koyuncu I; Kural E; Topacik D
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):233-40. PubMed ID: 11436786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of dye from aqueous solution using a combination of advanced oxidation process and nanofiltration.
    Banerjee P; Dasgupta S; De S
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Feb; 140(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16876933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lactic acid recovery from cheese whey fermentation broth using combined ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes.
    Li Y; Shahbazi A
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006; 129-132():985-96. PubMed ID: 16915706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separation of proteases from yellowfin tuna spleen by ultrafiltration.
    Li Z; Youravong W; H-Kittikun A
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Dec; 97(18):2364-70. PubMed ID: 16314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predation influences the structure of biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes.
    Derlon N; Peter-Varbanets M; Scheidegger A; Pronk W; Morgenroth E
    Water Res; 2012 Jun; 46(10):3323-33. PubMed ID: 22534121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scintigraphic Study of Local Flux and Osmotic Pressure Distributions in Ultrafiltration of Blood and Plasma.
    Defossez M; Ding L; Jaffrin M; Fauchet M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1996 Jan; 177(1):179-191. PubMed ID: 10479430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.