These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10340533)

  • 1. Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference.
    Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 May; 63(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 10340533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Klebaur JE; Bevins RA; Segar TM; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats.
    Robinet PM; Rowlett JK; Bardo MT
    Behav Processes; 1998 Jul; 44(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24896722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strain differences in response to escapable and inescapable novel environments and their ability to predict amphetamine-induced locomotor activity.
    Miserendino MJ; Haile CN; Kosten TA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 May; 167(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 12664191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeated amphetamine injections alter behavior and induce a delayed behavioral sensitization modulated by reactivity to novelty: Similarities and differences with trauma consequences.
    Toledano D; Gisquet-Verrier P
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):456-66. PubMed ID: 26830444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors that determine a propensity for cocaine-seeking behavior during abstinence in rats.
    Sutton MA; Karanian DA; Self DW
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2000 Jun; 22(6):626-41. PubMed ID: 10788762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning.
    Erb SM; Parker LA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Jul; 48(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 7938109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in the effect of novel environmental stimuli prior to amphetamine self-administration in rats (Rattus norvegicus).
    Cain ME; Dotson WF; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Aug; 14(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 16893281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption.
    Pelloux Y; Costentin J; Duterte-Boucher D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jan; 171(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12961061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independence of amphetamine reward from locomotor stimulation demonstrated by conditioned place preference.
    Carr GD; Phillips AG; Fibiger HC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 94(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 3127848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An animal model of sensation seeking: the adolescent rat.
    Stansfield KH; Philpot RM; Kirstein CL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1021():453-8. PubMed ID: 15251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novelty response and 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: Differential prediction of locomotor and affective response to amphetamine in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Garcia EJ; Cain ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Feb; 233(4):625-37. PubMed ID: 26564232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats.
    Meyer AC; Rahman S; Charnigo RJ; Dwoskin LP; Crabbe JC; Bardo MT
    Genes Brain Behav; 2010 Oct; 9(7):790-8. PubMed ID: 20618445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novelty seeking and drug use: contribution of an animal model.
    Cain ME; Saucier DA; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Nov; 13(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 16366767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novelty preference predicts place preference conditioning to morphine and its oral consumption in rats.
    Pelloux Y; Costentin J; Duterte-Boucher D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2006 May; 84(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16733065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist DNQX in the nucleus accumbens on drug-induced conditioned place preference.
    Layer RT; Uretsky NJ; Wallace LJ
    Brain Res; 1993 Jul; 617(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 8402155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in activity predict locomotor activity and conditioned place preference to amphetamine in both adolescent and adult rats.
    Mathews IZ; Morrissey MD; McCormick CM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2010 Mar; 95(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 20006968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between ethanol preference and sensation/novelty seeking.
    Manzo L; Gómez MJ; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Donaire R; Sabariego M; Fernández-Teruel A; Cañete A; Blázquez G; Papini MR; Torres C
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():53-60. PubMed ID: 24825783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.