These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10340533)
21. The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders. Cain ME; Smith CM; Bardo MT Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 15502935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differential housing and novelty response: Protection and risk from locomotor sensitization. Garcia EJ; Haddon TN; Saucier DA; Cain ME Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2017 Mar; 154():20-30. PubMed ID: 28108176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders. Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Individual differences in amphetamine self-administration: the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Cain ME; Denehy ED; Bardo MT Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Apr; 33(5):1149-61. PubMed ID: 17568395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sex, but not repeated maternal separation during the first postnatal week, influences novel object exploration and amphetamine sensitivity. Hensleigh E; Smedley L; Pritchard LM Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Mar; 53(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 20886535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of unconditioned novelty-seeking and d-amphetamine-conditioned motivation in mice. Laviola G; Adriani W Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Apr; 59(4):1011-20. PubMed ID: 9586862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Gong W; Neill DB; Justice JB Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1996 Jan; 53(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 8848450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The playground maze: a new method for measuring directed exploration in the rat. Nicholls B; Springham A; Mellanby J J Neurosci Methods; 1992 Jul; 43(2-3):171-80. PubMed ID: 1405741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Jodogne C; Marinelli M; Le Moal M; Piazza PV Brain Res; 1994 Sep; 657(1-2):236-44. PubMed ID: 7820624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of prenatal immune activation and peri-adolescent stress on amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference in the rat. Richtand NM; Ahlbrand R; Horn PS; Chambers B; Davis J; Benoit S Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Jul; 222(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 22290326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Harmonic and frequency modulated ultrasonic vocalizations reveal differences in conditioned and unconditioned reward processing. Garcia EJ; McCowan TJ; Cain ME Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():207-14. PubMed ID: 25827931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spontaneous individual differences in cognitive performances of young adult rats predict locomotor response to amphetamine. Dellu-Hagedorn F Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Jan; 83(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15607687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse. Orsini C; Buchini F; Piazza PV; Puglisi-Allegra S; Cabib S Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Mar; 172(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 14600800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Single trial nicotine conditioned place preference in pre-adolescent male and female rats. Edwards AW; Konz N; Hirsch Z; Weedon J; Dow-Edwards DL Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():1-7. PubMed ID: 25109273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sex differences in monoamines following amphetamine and social reward in adolescent rats. Weiss VG; Hofford RS; Yates JR; Jennings FC; Bardo MT Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2015 Aug; 23(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 26237317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of naltrexone on amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor behaviour in the rat. HÀggkvist J; Lindholm S; Franck J Addict Biol; 2009 Jul; 14(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19298318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Amphetamine exposure selectively enhances hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and attenuates amygdala-dependent cue learning. Ito R; Canseliet M Neuropsychopharmacology; 2010 Jun; 35(7):1440-52. PubMed ID: 20200510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evidence for the involvement of ERbeta and RGS9-2 in 17-beta estradiol enhancement of amphetamine-induced place preference behavior. Silverman JL; Koenig JI Horm Behav; 2007 Aug; 52(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 17493623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Susceptibility to morphine place conditioning: relationship with stress-induced locomotion and novelty-seeking behavior in juvenile and adult rats. Zheng X; Ke X; Tan B; Luo X; Xu W; Yang X; Sui N Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2003 Jul; 75(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 12957238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]