These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10340666)

  • 21. Microbiological status of Australian sheep meat.
    Vanderlinde PB; Shay B; Murray J
    J Food Prot; 1999 Apr; 62(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 10419211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microbial contamination of meat during the skinning of beef carcass hindquarters at three slaughtering plants.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC; Bryant J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 Jul; 42(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 9728688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using indicator bacteria and Salmonella test results from three large-scale beef abattoirs over an 18-month period to evaluate intervention system efficacy and plan carcass testing for Salmonella.
    Ruby JR; Zhu J; Ingham SC
    J Food Prot; 2007 Dec; 70(12):2732-40. PubMed ID: 18095424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Steam pasteurization of commercially slaughtered beef carcasses: evaluation of bacterial populations at five anatomical locations.
    Nutsch AL; Phebus RK; Riemann MJ; Kotrola JS; Wilson RC; Boyer JE; Brown TL
    J Food Prot; 1998 May; 61(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 9709229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incidence of coagulase positive Staphylococcus on beef carcasses in three Australian abattoirs.
    Desmarchelier PM; Higgs GM; Mills L; Sullivan AM; Vanderlinde PB
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 10359492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Seasonal prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants.
    Barkocy-Gallagher GA; Arthur TM; Rivera-Betancourt M; Nou X; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
    J Food Prot; 2003 Nov; 66(11):1978-86. PubMed ID: 14627272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of Bacteria Indicative of Fecal and Environmental Contamination from Hides to Carcasses.
    Cernicchiaro N; Oliveira ARS; Hoehn A; Cull CA; Noll LW; Shridhar PB; Nagaraja TG; Ives SE; Renter DG; Sanderson MW
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 Dec; 16(12):844-855. PubMed ID: 31381377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of total of Escherichia coli counts to assess the hygienic characteristics of a beef carcass dressing process.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC; Badoni M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1996 Aug; 31(1-3):181-96. PubMed ID: 8880307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microbiological monitoring of sheep carcass contamination in three Swiss abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Stephan R
    J Food Prot; 2003 Jun; 66(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 12800993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of countercurrent scalding and postscald spray on the bacteriologic profile of raw chicken carcasses.
    James WO; Prucha JC; Brewer RL; Williams WO; Christensen WA; Thaler AM; Hogue AT
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Sep; 201(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 1399771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems.
    Bolton DJ; Pearce RA; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D
    J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 92(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 11972694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One-year (2003) nationwide pork carcass microbiological baseline data survey in Taiwan.
    Yeh KS; Chen SP; Lin JH
    J Food Prot; 2005 Mar; 68(3):458-61. PubMed ID: 15771166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of three sampling methods for the microbiological analysis of broiler carcasses after immersion chilling.
    Giombelli A; Cavani R; Gloria MB
    J Food Prot; 2013 Aug; 76(8):1330-5. PubMed ID: 23905787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microbiological conditions of sheep carcasses from conventional or inverted dressing processes.
    Gill CO; Bryant J; Brereton DA
    J Food Prot; 2000 Sep; 63(9):1291-4. PubMed ID: 10983809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Zero-tolerance for faecal contamination of carcasses as a tool in the control of O157 VTEC infections.
    Heuvelink AE; Roessink GL; Bosboom K; de Boer E
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 May; 66(1-2):13-20. PubMed ID: 11407542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Moen B; Røtterud OJ; Dommersnes S; Nesteng O; Østensvik Ø; Alvseike O
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():70-76. PubMed ID: 26248068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microbiological quality of Australian sheep meat.
    Phillips D; Sumner J; Alexander JF; Dutton KM
    J Food Prot; 2001 May; 64(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 11348003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of the principal points of product contamination during beef carcass dressing processes in Northern Ireland.
    Madden RH; Murray KA; Gilmour A
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jul; 67(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 15270508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.