These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10341692)

  • 61. Half-value layer and intensity variations as a function of position in the radiation field for film-screen mammography.
    Terry JA; Waggener RG; Miller Blough MA
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 10076984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Information yield: a comparison of Kodak T-Mat G, Ortho L and RP X-Omat films.
    Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2599233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. An evaluation of four rare-earth film-screen combinations.
    Nettle JR; Ritchings RT
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Oct; 53(634):965-8. PubMed ID: 7426919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Recent films and screens for mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 63(756):966-7. PubMed ID: 2268767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of afterglow response in irradiated intensifying screens.
    Okkalides D
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 41(10):2173-8. PubMed ID: 8912388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A new phantom for mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Feb; 64(758):116-20. PubMed ID: 2004202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Coregistered tomographic x-ray and optical breast imaging: initial results.
    Zhang Q; Brukilacchio TJ; Li A; Stott JJ; Chaves T; Hillman E; Wu T; Chorlton M; Rafferty E; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Boas DA
    J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(2):024033. PubMed ID: 15910106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Improved fracture detection using the mammographic film-screen combination.
    Faridah Y; Abdullah B; Ng Kh
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2005 Jul; 1(1):e3. PubMed ID: 21625275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
    Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Jun; 62(738):565. PubMed ID: 2736351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.