80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10342679)
1. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: a registry-based study in the Romagna region of Italy (1986-1993).
Serafini M; Cordaro C; Montanari E; Falcini F; Bucchi L
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 28(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 10342679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Is hysterectomy a "definitive" treatment compared to conization?
Tanaka M; Yamanoi K; Taki M; Kitamura S; Sunada M; Chigusa Y; Horie A; Yamaguchi K; Hamanishi J; Mandai M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2361-2369. PubMed ID: 37354106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cancer registry in the monitoring of cervical screening practice: the neglected value of the Pap smear in patients diagnosed with CIN3 on biopsy.
Serafini M; Bucchi L; Falcini F; Cordaro C; Montanari E; Amadori A; Amadori D
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9511850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study.
McCredie MR; Sharples KJ; Paul C; Baranyai J; Medley G; Jones RW; Skegg DC
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 18407790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Muntz HG; Bell DA; Lage JM; Goff BA; Feldman S; Rice LW
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):935-9. PubMed ID: 1448263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term risk of cervical cancer following conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3-A Danish nationwide cohort study.
Sand FL; Frederiksen K; Munk C; Jensen SM; Kjaer SK
Int J Cancer; 2018 May; 142(9):1759-1766. PubMed ID: 29218720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy.
Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk of cervical cancer after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: A population-based cohort study with 80,442 women.
Loopik DL; IntHout J; Ebisch RMF; Melchers WJG; Massuger LFAG; Siebers AG; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 31973912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colposcopy, conization, and hysterectomy practices: a current perspective.
Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Simpson ML; Shaw D
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Nov; 60(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 7145247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-Conization FIGO stage IA1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma; is hysterectomy necessary?
Escamilla Galindo EP; Medina Ramos NF; Santana Mateo YL; Armas Roca M; Molero Sala L; León Arencibia L; Arencibia Sánchez O; Martín Martínez AI
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():368-373. PubMed ID: 34399105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical conization with frozen section before planned hysterectomy.
Hoffman MS; Collins E; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 8355940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in adolescent women: incidence and treatment outcomes.
Case AS; Rocconi RP; Straughn JM; Wang W; Roark K; Waltman EE; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1369-74. PubMed ID: 17138768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histological features of CIN3 and their value in predicting invasive microinvasive squamous carcinoma.
al-Nafussi AI; Hughes DE
J Clin Pathol; 1994 Sep; 47(9):799-804. PubMed ID: 7962647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening in Italy: quality of colposcopy and treatment. 2009 activity.
Ronco G; Volante R; Giubilato P
Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(5-6 Suppl 5):78-86. PubMed ID: 22166351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
