These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10342994)
1. A de minimis exception to the Delaney Clause: a reassessment of Les v. Reilly. Sheehy DT Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):257-84. PubMed ID: 10342994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living with and reforming the Delaney Clause. Degnan FH; Flamm WG Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):235-56. PubMed ID: 10342993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA. Fenner-Crisp PA Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically. Williams GM; Karbe E; Fenner-Crisp P; Iatropoulos MJ; Weisburger JH Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):209-15. PubMed ID: 8672879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human protection against non-genotoxic carcinogens in the US without the Delaney Clause. Weisburger JH Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):201-8. PubMed ID: 8672878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delaney clause heads for the history books. Appel A Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6536):109. PubMed ID: 7603551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the Delaney Clause at the FDA. Lorentzen RJ Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):198. PubMed ID: 8672876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Precautionary principle leads to "may contain" clause for genetically modified foods. Pinker S CMAJ; 2000 Mar; 162(6):874. PubMed ID: 10750480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause. Weisburger JH Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):183-8. PubMed ID: 8672873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current carcinogen perspectives: De minimis, Delaney and decisions. Weisburger EK Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 2690341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past. Krishan M; Navarro L; Beck B; Carvajal R; Dourson M Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2021 Dec; 433():115779. PubMed ID: 34737146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer-causing substances in food, drugs, and cosmetics. The de minimis rule versus the Delaney clause. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1988 Nov; 319(19):1262-4. PubMed ID: 3273488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fungicide regulation and food safety. Goldman LR Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5201):1080-1. PubMed ID: 7855584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Food safety regulation: reforming the Delaney Clause. Merrill RA Annu Rev Public Health; 1997; 18():313-40. PubMed ID: 9143722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Food safety and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Delaney Clause). AMA Council on Scientific Affairs. Conn Med; 1980 Mar; 44(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 7363620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Carcinogens in food and the Delaney clause. Jukes TH JAMA; 1979 Feb; 241(6):617-9. PubMed ID: 762818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mutagens and carcinogens in the diet. Regulatory perspective: Japan. Sato S Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 347():295-306. PubMed ID: 2217398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]