These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10343064)

  • 1. The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks.
    Kühberger A; Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Perner J
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Jun; 78(3):204-231. PubMed ID: 10343064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gain-Loss Framing and Choice: Separating Outcome Formulations from Descriptor Formulations.
    Mandel DR
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 May; 85(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 11341817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Framing the Game: Examining Frame Choice in Bargaining.
    Blount S; Larrick RP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jan; 81(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 10631068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?
    Rönnlund M; Karlsson E; Laggnäs E; Larsson L; Lindström T
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jan; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15685961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
    Trepel C; Fox CR; Poldrack RA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15795132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.
    Kühberger A
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Jul; 75(1):23-55. PubMed ID: 9719656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict Aversion: Preference for Ambiguity vs Conflict in Sources and Evidence.
    Smithson M
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Sep; 79(3):179-198. PubMed ID: 10471360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The framing effect: medical implications].
    Mazzocco K; Cherubini P; Rumiati R
    Ann Ital Med Int; 2005; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15859389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Looking Closer at the Effects of Framing on Risky Choice: An Item Response Theory Analysis.
    Sickar MJ; Highhouse S
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Jul; 75(1):75-91. PubMed ID: 9719658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When payoffs look like probabilities: Separating form and content in risky choice.
    Müller-Trede J; Sher S; McKenzie CRM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 29745710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Framing Effects: Dynamics and Task Domains.
    Wang XT
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1996 Nov; 68(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 8954876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Framing health messages based on anomalies in time preference.
    Ortendahl M; Fries JF
    Med Sci Monit; 2005 Aug; 11(8):RA253-6. PubMed ID: 16049392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Framing effects in choices between multioutcome life-expectancy lotteries.
    Bernstein LM; Chapman GB; Elstein AS
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(3):324-38. PubMed ID: 10424839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context effects: the proportional difference model and the reflection of preference.
    Gonzalez-Vallejo C; Reid AA; Schiltz J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):942-54. PubMed ID: 14516226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.
    Marsh B; Kacelnik A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Mar; 99(5):3352-5. PubMed ID: 11867709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions.
    Krishnamurthy P; Carter P; Blair E
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Jul; 85(2):382-399. PubMed ID: 11461207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Framing From Experience: Cognitive Processes and Predictions of Risky Choice.
    Gonzalez C; Mehlhorn K
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 40(5):1163-91. PubMed ID: 27427284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB; I'Haridon O
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 24103499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.