126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10343430)
1. Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.
Lester H; Wilson S
Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Mar; 49(440):223-9. PubMed ID: 10343430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who are the women who default from colposcopy clinics?
Usha Kiran TS; Jayawickrama NS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 12521425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who defaults from colposcopy? A multi-centre, population-based, prospective cohort study of predictors of non-attendance for follow-up among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology.
Sharp L; Cotton S; Thornton A; Gray N; Cruickshank M; Whynes D; Duncan I; Hammond R; Smart L; Little J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 22921577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can default rates in colposcopy really be reduced?
Balasubramani L; Orbell S; Hagger M; Brown V; Tidy J
BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 18190379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions.
Khanna N; Phillips MD
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11314919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilisation and outcomes of cervical cancer prevention services among HIV-infected women in Cape Town.
Batra P; Kuhn L; Denny L
S Afr Med J; 2010 Jan; 100(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 20429487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into the default rate at the Fife colposcopy clinic: implications for target setting.
Patterson T; Roworth M; Hill M
J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 7786572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing and piloting an intervention to reduce colposcopy non-attendance and corresponding inequalities: a mixed-methods study.
Cowling A; Nevens L; Contogiorgi N; Bradley N; Wilcockson C; Stebbings C; McMeekin P; Steer M; Harland J
Lancet; 2023 Nov; 402 Suppl 1():S35. PubMed ID: 37997076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of current patterns of Pap smear and colposcopy use.
Kavanagh AM; Santow G; Mitchell H
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8861048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding factors related to women's adherence to colposcopy.
Pritham UA; Brigdon A; Jones M
Nurs Womens Health; 2014; 18(5):402-12. PubMed ID: 25316540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.
Miller SM; Tagai EK; Wen KY; Lee M; Hui SA; Kurtz D; Scarpato J; Hernandez E
Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Jul; 100(7):1353-1359. PubMed ID: 28190541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing Unmet Basic Needs to Improve Colposcopy Adherence Among Women With Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening.
Kuroki L; Massad LS; Martin A; Liu J; Brown D; Leon A; Groesch K; Wilson T; Zeino Y; Diaz-Sylvester P; Delfino K; Hyon K; Kreuter M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2021 Apr; 25(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 33631781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does improving communication and information for women increase attendance at colposcopy in an inner city clinic? A randomised controlled trial.
Tomlinson A; Kyrgiou M; Paraskevaidis E; Kitchener H; Martin-Hirsch P
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 15285300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Default from colposcopy and loop excision electrocautery procedure appointments in a military clinic.
Yauger BJ; Rodriguez M; Parker MF
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Apr; 9(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 15870527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved adherence to colposcopy through nurse-led telephone counselling and multifaceted patient support.
Dunn S; Rossiter L; Ferne J; Barnes E; Wu W
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):723-729. PubMed ID: 24007708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Access to colposcopy services for high-risk Canadian women: can we do better?
Ogilvie GS; Shaw EA; Lusk SP; Zazulak J; Kaczorowski JA
Can J Public Health; 2004; 95(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 15490923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
