These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10344358)

  • 1. Effect of permeability on indices of haemodialysis membrane biocompatibility.
    Masaki T; Gilson J; Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 May; 14(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 10344358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical characterization of Dicea a new cellulose membrane for haemodialysis.
    Hoenich NA; Woffindin C; Cox PJ; Goldfinch M; Roberts SJ
    Clin Nephrol; 1997 Oct; 48(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9352161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of substituted cellulose and synthetic membranes.
    Mandolfo S; Tetta C; David S; Gervasio R; Ognibene D; Wratten ML; Tessore E; Imbasciati E
    Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Nov; 20(11):603-9. PubMed ID: 9464869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anaphylatoxin formation during hemodialysis: effects of different dialyzer membranes.
    Chenoweth DE; Cheung AK; Henderson LW
    Kidney Int; 1983 Dec; 24(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 6609269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of biocompatibility of hemophane, cellulose diacetate and acrilonitile membranes in hemodialysis].
    Germin Petrović D
    Acta Med Croatica; 2004; 58(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15125391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synthetically modified cellulose: an alternative to synthetic membranes for use in haemodialysis?
    Hoenich NA; Woffindin C; Stamp S; Roberts SJ; Turnbull J
    Biomaterials; 1997 Oct; 18(19):1299-303. PubMed ID: 9307219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compartmental distribution of complement activation products in artificial kidneys.
    Cheung AK; Chenoweth DE; Otsuka D; Henderson LW
    Kidney Int; 1986 Jul; 30(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 3489123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes: interrelations between plasma complement and cytokine levels.
    Varela MP; Kimmel PL; Phillips TM; Mishkin GJ; Lew SQ; Bosch JP
    Blood Purif; 2001; 19(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 11574733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of dialysis membrane on serum beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) in chronic haemodialysis patients.
    Farrell J; Bastani B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1997 Apr; 12(4):856. PubMed ID: 9141041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of cellulose diacetate and polysulfone membranes in the outcome of acute renal failure. A prospective randomized study.
    Gastaldello K; Melot C; Kahn RJ; Vanherweghem JL; Vincent JL; Tielemans C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000 Feb; 15(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 10648669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility differences with respect to the dialyzer sterilization method.
    Müller TF; Seitz M; Eckle I; Lange H; Kolb G
    Nephron; 1998; 78(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 9496728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethylene-oxide and steam-sterilised polysulfone membrane in dialysis patients with eosinophilia.
    Santoro A; Ferrari G; Francioso A; Zucchelli P; Duranti E; Sasdelli M; Rosati A; Salvadori M; Sanna GM; Briganti M; Fusaroli M; Lindner G; Stefani A; Borgatti P; Badiali F; Mignani R; Cagnoli L; Aucella F; Stallone C; Massazza M; Borghi M; Gualandris L; Modoni S; Grandone E; Orlandini G
    Int J Artif Organs; 1996 Jun; 19(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 8814494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biocompatibility of different hemodialysis and plasmapheresis membranes.
    Jørstad S
    Blood Purif; 1987; 5(2-3):123-37. PubMed ID: 3497645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of procoagulatory activity of haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration with a polysulfone membrane (APS) and with different modes of enoxaparin anticoagulation.
    Klingel R; Schaefer M; Schwarting A; Himmelsbach F; Altes U; Uhlenbusch-Körwer I; Hafner G
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Jan; 19(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 14671052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generation and removal of anaphylatoxins during hemofiltration with five different membranes.
    Jørstad S; Smeby LC; Balstad T; Widerøe TE
    Blood Purif; 1988; 6(6):325-35. PubMed ID: 3264706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the hydraulic permeability of polysulfone dialysers.
    Eloot S; De Wachter D; Vienken J; Pohlmeier R; Verdonck P
    Int J Artif Organs; 2002 Mar; 25(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 11999193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility and performance of a modified cellulosic and a synthetic high flux dialyzer. A randomized crossover comparison between cellulose triacetate and polysulphon.
    Grooteman MP; Nubé MJ; van Limbeek J; van Houte AJ; Daha MR; van Geelen JA
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 7640431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cellulose membranes--time for a change?
    Henderson LW; Chenoweth DE
    Contrib Nephrol; 1985; 44():112-26. PubMed ID: 3872769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beta2-microglobulin and low-flux synthetic dialyzers.
    Klinkmann H; Buscaroli A; Stefoni S
    Artif Organs; 1998 Jul; 22(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 9684696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes: evaluation in an ovine model.
    Burhop KE; Johnson RJ; Simpson J; Chenoweth DE; Borgia J
    J Lab Clin Med; 1993 Feb; 121(2):276-93. PubMed ID: 8433041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.