These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10344810)
1. Stark II makes it easier to terminate bad contracts. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Dec; 7(12):46-7. PubMed ID: 10344810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2008 Jan; 22(1):42-3, 56. PubMed ID: 18271439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes to the federal Stark law that affect diagnostic imaging arrangements. Stirewalt K Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 20092174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technically prohibited contracts may still be ok under Stark II law. Caesar N Manag Care; 1999 Jan; 8(1):58-9. PubMed ID: 10346101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stark revisions arrive. Docs await CMS referral changes--whatever they are. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New final Stark II regulations. Pontius CA MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HCFA makes concession on 'Stark I' exemptions. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):48. PubMed ID: 10152138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician group practice implications under the proposed Stark II regulations. Sokolow DS Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Aug; ():6-9. PubMed ID: 10661984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules. Portman RM; Lisa GC Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience. Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark II regulations anticipated. Kannensohn K Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Jul; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 10161644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers? Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FAHS refers Stark II reactions to HCFA. Gogal L Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):4. PubMed ID: 10185365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stark II: the quagmire thickens. Ivers D J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions. Shay AW; Murphy SL Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]