155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10345012)
1. Deciphering the maze of Stark II regulations takes work.
Physician Relat Update; 1998 Oct; 7(10):109-11. PubMed ID: 10345012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician group practice implications under the proposed Stark II regulations.
Sokolow DS
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Aug; ():6-9. PubMed ID: 10661984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New Stark II rules on referrals will further restrict medical practices.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):96-8. PubMed ID: 10168642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stark II: division of profits comes under closer scrutiny.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 7(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10180805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1.
Riley J; Pristave R
Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does your compensation formula pass the smell test?
Rice B
Med Econ; 2002 Feb; 79(4):72, 75, 81. PubMed ID: 11892234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten myths about the Stark statute debunked.
Gosfield AG
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 15018367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The physician incentive plan rule: reevaluating physician compensation arrangements.
Gauvreau E
Manag Care Interface; 1997 Sep; 10(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 10175545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stark: the key exceptions for group practices.
Cassidy MA
Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Sep; ():4-10. PubMed ID: 11594198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stark II proposed regulations. Impacting group practices and physician employers.
Wachler AB; Avery PA
Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10179373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stark II final regulations: hot issues for physician practices.
Falk R; Hance A
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15523769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stark II: the quagmire thickens.
Ivers D
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark II and physician compensation models: integrating business and legal issues.
Pursell D; Marsh J; Thompson D; Potter K
J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 15968939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New Stark regulations: Key issues for health care decision-makers.
Johnson BA; Niederman GA; Bowman LE; McCullough AC
Med Group Manage J; 1998; 45(2):10, 12-5, 50. PubMed ID: 10178589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations.
Davis JP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Stark regulations: so much text; so little substance.
Conn L; Weissburg C
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(6):25-7, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10153032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices.
Larios D; Meyer A
Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stark self-referral rules burdened with complexities.
Barratt K; Katayama A
Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 8571621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
