These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10345012)
21. Group practice structure and compensation plans under Stark II regulations. Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2001 May; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 11398740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions. Shay AW; Murphy SL Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Federal anti-referral statute raises unanswered questions. Part II: Issues relating to exceptions. Conn LC; Oppenheim CB Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Nov; 9(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10137767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Gainsharing: a concept whose time has come? Perling LJ; Gassman AS Health Care Law Mon; 1999 May; ():25-33. PubMed ID: 10538269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Stark Act regulations: an overview. Becker S Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Apr; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 11345895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers? Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II. Katayama AC WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Technically prohibited contracts may still be ok under Stark II law. Caesar N Manag Care; 1999 Jan; 8(1):58-9. PubMed ID: 10346101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. New Stark regs threaten groups' ties to independent physicians. Caesar N Manag Care; 1995 Dec; 4(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 10153805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proposed Stark II rules: clarification or more confusion? Shay A; Francesconi G J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):95-113. PubMed ID: 10186240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Stark II wants contribution plan installed before payment period begins. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Oct; 7(10):52-3. PubMed ID: 10185866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The new Stark II regulations: do you still comply? Hirsch WR J Cardiovasc Manag; 1998; 9(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10178724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. HCFA needs to shine some light through Stark II's murkiness on 'gifts'. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 7(11):56-7. PubMed ID: 10187130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. When a favor becomes a kickback. Laigaie BN Med Econ; 1995 Sep; 72(17):49-52. PubMed ID: 10151342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Can Congress will the battle over fraud and abuse? Sokol EW Caring; 1996 Feb; 15(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 10156980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Stark II, phase II. What it means for physician compensation. Johnson BA MGMA Connex; 2004; 4(5):43-8, 1. PubMed ID: 15202200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]