These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10345357)

  • 1. Publicly reported data impacts administrative procedures, contracting decisions.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Oct; 2(10):158-9. PubMed ID: 10345357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost management of coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Saha SP; Hill KS
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2005 Aug; 103(8):355-60. PubMed ID: 16134429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania.
    Wang J; Hockenberry J; Chou SY; Yang M
    J Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 30(2):392-407. PubMed ID: 21195494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving cardiac surgery quality--volume, outcome, process?
    Shahian DM
    JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(2):246-8. PubMed ID: 14722153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released reports on coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Bentley JM; Nash DB
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Jan; 24(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 9494873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do quality report cards make a difference? The New York and Pennsylvania experience with releasing physician-specific outcomes.
    O'Rourke LM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):2-11. PubMed ID: 10130698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Brooke BS; Perler BA; Dominici F; Makary MA; Pronovost PJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. PubMed ID: 18514832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of interhospital transfers on surgical quality metrics for academic medical centers.
    Crippen CJ; Hughes SJ; Chen S; Behrns KE
    Am Surg; 2014 Jul; 80(7):690-5. PubMed ID: 24987902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of risk-adjusted bypass surgery stratification models in a community hospital.
    Reed JF; Olenchock SA
    Heart Lung; 2003; 32(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 14652530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of definition of mortality on hospital profiles.
    Johnson ML; Gordon HS; Petersen NJ; Wray NP; Shroyer AL; Grover FL; Geraci JM
    Med Care; 2002 Jan; 40(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 11748422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real results. Pa. report gives consumers outcomes data they can use.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1998 May; 28(20):46. PubMed ID: 10179693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results from phase II of a statewide quality improvement initiative.
    Holman WL; Sansom M; Kiefe CI; Peterson ED; Hubbard SG; Delong JF; Allman RM
    Ann Surg; 2004 Jan; 239(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 14685107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operative outcome and hospital cost.
    Ferraris VA; Ferraris SP; Singh A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Mar; 115(3):593-602; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 9535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total hip replacement surgery: comparing costs, performance against hospitals nationwide.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1999 Jul; 4(7):109-11. PubMed ID: 10539507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card.
    Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB
    Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating new technology with managed care contracting.
    DeCerce J; Kaden RJ; Zupa K
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1998; 9(Suppl):3-15. PubMed ID: 10181697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relation between quantity and quality with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
    Banta D; Bos M
    Health Policy; 1991 Jun; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10112297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top performers in heart surgery.
    Mathias JM
    OR Manager; 1999 Jul; 15(7):24-5, 27. PubMed ID: 10539070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of benchmarking projects on outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: challenges and prospects regarding the quality improvement initiative.
    Miyata H; Motomura N; Murakami A; Takamoto S;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1364-9. PubMed ID: 22595627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Wennberg DE; Lucas FL; Siewers AE; Kellett MA; Malenka DJ
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(16):1961-8. PubMed ID: 15507581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.