BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10345377)

  • 21. How hospitals can use internal benchmark data to create effective managed care arrangements.
    Alba T; Souders J; McGhee G
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 10134007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Regional data on low back pain point to improvement potential.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Jun; 2(6):89-90. PubMed ID: 10345379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Change comes easier when you speak physicians' language.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 Oct; 4(10):154-6, 145. PubMed ID: 11149358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SC starts on-line physician comparison data system.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1999 May; 6(5):55-7. PubMed ID: 10351767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Data on employee physician profiling.
    Emmons DW; Wozniak GD; Otten RD; Baker NA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Mar; 26(3):73-82. PubMed ID: 10127074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physician practices go under the microscope.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1990 Feb; 64(4):32-7. PubMed ID: 2105264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Data comparison helps medical center improve service, cut costs.
    Siwicki B
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Feb; 47(2):62. PubMed ID: 10145754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Data trends. Broadening the use of financial data to improve patient care.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jun; 56(6):78. PubMed ID: 12061054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Economic credentialing and exclusive contracts.
    Kristeller AR
    N J Med; 1997 May; 94(5):63-5. PubMed ID: 9164107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. TQM: best antidote for MD practice problems.
    Johnsson J
    Hospitals; 1992 Mar; 66(5):64. PubMed ID: 1740294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why doctors are afraid of numbers.
    Marco AP
    Physician Exec; 2002; 28(3):30-3. PubMed ID: 12055951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Cincinnati initiative.
    Manus DA; Strub RJ; Werner TR
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10132788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of managed care on practicing physicians.
    Collins KS; Sandman D
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1996; 73(2 Suppl):490-5. PubMed ID: 8988301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A search for quality and value in health care. Cincinnati initiative targets physician-specific data.
    Strub RJ
    Internist; 1993 Sep; 34(8):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10129084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changing MD behavior through continuous quality improvement.
    Thompson RE
    Trustee; 1991 Oct; 44(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 10114283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring physician performance to improve care and save costs on pharmaceutical usage.
    Diamond CC; Goddette G; Hanchak NA
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Feb; 11(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 10178834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health system finds sharing data with doctors produces practice changes.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 Apr; 4(4):58-60. PubMed ID: 11066660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conduct physician outlier analysis to gain control of costs.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Mar; 9(3):36-43, 33. PubMed ID: 11928647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Grouping patients by episode helps managers compare 'apples to apples' performance.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Jul; 2(7):101-6. PubMed ID: 10345597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The American difference in health care costs: is there a problem? Is medical necessity the solution?
    Jost TS
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1999 Dec; (249):9-34. PubMed ID: 10747456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.