These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10345566)

  • 1. Choosing an appropriate unit of analysis in trials of interventions that attempt to influence practice.
    Wood J; Freemantle N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1999 Jan; 4(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10345566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods of health services evaluation: the gospel of Archie Cochrane after 25 years.
    Russell I
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Apr; 1(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 10180849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach.
    Campbell MK; Mollison J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM; Eccles M
    Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 17(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 10758085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health services research--what it is, how to do it, and why it matters.
    Lilford RJ; Harrison S
    Health Serv Manage Res; 1994 Nov; 7(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 10138682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data.
    Gulliford MC; Adams G; Ukoumunne OC; Latinovic R; Chinn S; Campbell MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15718113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing evaluations of interventions to change professional practice.
    Mason J; Wood J; Freemantle N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1999 Apr; 4(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 10387402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change.
    Luce BR; Kramer JM; Goodman SN; Connor JT; Tunis S; Whicher D; Schwartz JS
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 19567619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Entangled complexity: why complex interventions are just not complicated enough.
    Cohn S; Clinch M; Bunn C; Stronge P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2013 Jan; 18(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 23393041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research.
    Campbell MK; Fayers PM; Grimshaw JM
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16279131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postnatal debriefing interventions to prevent maternal mental health problems after birth: exploring the gap between the evidence and UK policy and practice.
    Rowan C; Bick D; Bastos MH
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 17553110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the consensus development conference method in healthcare research.
    Halcomb E; Davidson P; Hardaker L
    Nurse Res; 2008; 16(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 19025106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seven reasons why you should not categorize continuous data.
    Dinero TE
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 10162905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the health effects of social interventions.
    Thomson H; Hoskins R; Petticrew M; Ogilvie D; Craig N; Quinn T; Lindsay G
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7434):282-5. PubMed ID: 14751903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analyses of cluster randomization trials. Power considerations.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 12971203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Case study evaluation.
    Keen J; Packwood T
    BMJ; 1995 Aug; 311(7002):444-6. PubMed ID: 7640596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytic considerations in economic evaluations of multinational cardiovascular clinical trials.
    Torti FM; Reed SD; Schulman KA
    Value Health; 2006; 9(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16961546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to test service interventions: issues of standardisation, selection and generalisability.
    Watson B; Procter S; Cochrana W
    Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):28-42. PubMed ID: 15065482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.