These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10346622)

  • 1. When the patient changed her mind. Schreiber v. Physicians Ins. Co.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Mar; 16(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 10346622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The continued vitality of a patient's informed consent, or, when the patient says 'no'.
    Barratt K; von Briesen JD
    WMJ; 1999; 98(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 10235066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company.
    Wisconsin. Supreme Court
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1999 Jan; 588():26-35. PubMed ID: 12041177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company.
    Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1998 Feb; 579():730-9. PubMed ID: 12041174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Woman in labor can withdraw consent for VBAC at any time. Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin.
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(3):56-7. PubMed ID: 10184972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.
    Ketler SK
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
    Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
    Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent when an investigation is interrupted.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1992 Jan; 339(8784):51-2. PubMed ID: 1345964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [50 obstetric malpractice cases: difficult to draw limits, inconsistent decisions].
    Lindmark G
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Jan; 89(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 1734145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Patient risk information within the scope of obstetrics].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Jun; 55(6):M68-72. PubMed ID: 7657134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent and 25% risk of paralysis.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1989 Jul; 2(8653):57-8. PubMed ID: 2567837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A procrustean approach to informed consent: the Texas Medical Disclosure Panel.
    Richards EP; Rathbun KC
    Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 6923126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal aspects of consent 3: the duty of care to inform.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Apr 12-25; 10(7):466-8. PubMed ID: 12070391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal implications of birth videos.
    Eitel DR; Yankowitz J; Ely JW
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Mar; 46(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 9519024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent issues throughout the birthing process.
    Woolery W
    J Leg Med; 2000 Jun; 21(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 10911697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent and hospital's liability for honorary surgeon: an Australian decision.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 Apr; 335(8696):1027-8. PubMed ID: 1970074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [What are the medico-legal implications of induced labor?].
    Pierre F; Bardin-Bedu C; Fabre H; Gombau HN; Soutoul JH
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(1 Suppl):120-8. PubMed ID: 8550970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section.
    Schifrin BS; Cohen WR
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent for obstetrics management: a urogynecologic perspective.
    Davila GW
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2001; 12(5):289-91. PubMed ID: 11715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.