247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10346702)
1. The Stark laws: conquering physician conflicts of interest?
Klein JE
Georgetown Law J; 1998 Nov; 87(2):499-529. PubMed ID: 10346702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Stark II rules: clarification or more confusion?
Shay A; Francesconi G
J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):95-113. PubMed ID: 10186240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stark, antikickback laws, and the OR.
Murphy LS
OR Manager; 1998 Jun; 14(6):21-3. PubMed ID: 10180036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Stark regulations: so much text; so little substance.
Conn L; Weissburg C
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(6):25-7, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10153032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated delivery systems: reforming the conflicts among federal referral, tax exemption, and antitrust laws.
Woodhall AL
Health Matrix Clevel; 1995; 5(1):181-248. PubMed ID: 10141744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Yet more changes to the stark law regulations.
Reisman G; Wool HS; Chananie SJ; Finnegan JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 19179234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stark II: the quagmire thickens.
Ivers D
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten myths about the Stark statute debunked.
Gosfield AG
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 15018367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stark Act regulations: an overview.
Becker S
Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Apr; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 11345895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New Stark regs threaten groups' ties to independent physicians.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1995 Dec; 4(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 10153805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes to the federal Stark law that affect diagnostic imaging arrangements.
Stirewalt K
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 20092174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stark II proposed regulations. Impacting group practices and physician employers.
Wachler AB; Avery PA
Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10179373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The emperor has no clothes: examining the employee exception to the anti-referral laws.
Scheutzow SO
J Health Law; 2001; 34(1):21-45. PubMed ID: 11263138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How did physician ownership become a federal case? The Stark Amendments and their prospects.
Stout SM; Warner DC
HEC Forum; 2003 Jun; 15(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 12918284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 1999 LeTourneau Award. An analysis of anti-kickback and self-referral law in modern health care.
Morrison AW
J Leg Med; 2000 Sep; 21(3):351-94. PubMed ID: 11055155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals.
Wales SD
Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciphering the maze of Stark II regulations takes work.
Physician Relat Update; 1998 Oct; 7(10):109-11. PubMed ID: 10345012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
