These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10346717)

  • 21. Liability perspectives on reuse of single-use medical devices.
    Spencer P; Zakaib G; Winter E
    Health Law Can; 2001 Nov; 22(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 11763660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re-using 'single-use' medical devices.
    Dunn JP
    N Z Med J; 2000 Oct; 113(1120):452. PubMed ID: 11194773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Recycling and reuse of disposable products in radiology].
    Golder W
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):361-5. PubMed ID: 12635012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reuse of disposables. Reprocessing issues taking users down 'slippery slope'.
    OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10157849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reuse of single-use critical medical devices.
    Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2009; 32(3):228-9. PubMed ID: 19506444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Debate on reuse of "disposable" medical equipment fueled by FDA.
    Gibson NK
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Jan; 14(1):75. PubMed ID: 9641860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. If it is reusable, why not reuse it?
    Belkin NL
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):357-8. PubMed ID: 12138970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Overview of the problem: reprocessing versus disposal of endoscopic accessories.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 10683218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The precautionary principle: what is the risk of reusing disposable drops in routine ophthalmology consultations and what are the costs of reducing this risk to zero?
    Somner JE; Cavanagh DJ; Wong KK; Whitelaw M; Thomson T; Mansfield D
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Feb; 24(2):361-3. PubMed ID: 19521427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Reuse of disposable equipment. Medicolegal viewpoint].
    Fallani M; Milandri M
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1996 May; 44(5):263-73. PubMed ID: 8927256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. FDA user fee and Modernisation Act.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Dec; 13(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 12575526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reuse pow-wow resolves little.
    Haugh R
    OR Manager; 1999 Jul; 15(7):9-10. PubMed ID: 10539075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reprocessing disposables: one strategy to balance cost reduction and quality patient care.
    English N
    Todays Surg Nurse; 1996; 18(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 8991726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refurbished medical equipment.
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1998 Apr; 9(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10179194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reusing medical devices. Ensuring safety the second time around.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 2000; 34(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11590804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reprocessors threatened. Bill could complicate reconditioning single-use devices.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(20):22. PubMed ID: 12048837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advantages of reusable accessories.
    Wolfsen HC
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reusable versus single-use laparoscopy instruments: who is responsible for patient safety?
    Cahill NE
    Minim Invasive Surg Nurs; 1994; 8(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 7812384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.