These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10347641)

  • 1. [The practice of systematic reviews. IV. Pooling results from separate studies].
    Scholten RJ; Kostense PJ; Assendelft WJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(15):786-91. PubMed ID: 10347641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis: when and how.
    Imperiale TF
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
    Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in the one-step method for pooling study results.
    Greenland S; Salvan A
    Stat Med; 1990 Mar; 9(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 2343220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The meta-analysis of data from individual patients].
    Rovers MM; Reitsma JB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(31):A4743. PubMed ID: 22853768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploration of heterogeneity in distributed research network drug safety analyses.
    Hansen RA; Zeng P; Ryan P; Gao J; Sonawane K; Teeter B; Westrich K; Dubois RW
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 26052957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical evaluation of meta-analytic approaches for nutrient and health outcome dose-response data.
    Yu WW; Schmid CH; Lichtenstein AH; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 25379059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.
    Trikalinos TA; Hoaglin DC; Small KM; Terrin N; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):294-312. PubMed ID: 26052954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods.
    Jakobsen JC; Wetterslev J; Winkel P; Lange T; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():120. PubMed ID: 25416419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change.
    Cornell JE; Mulrow CD; Localio R; Stack CB; Meibohm AR; Guallar E; Goodman SN
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 160(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 24727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pooling systematic reviews of systematic reviews: a Bayesian panoramic meta-analysis.
    Hemming K; Bowater RJ; Lilford RJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 21965138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ratio of geometric means to analyze continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: comparison to mean differences and ratio of arithmetic means using empiric data and simulation.
    Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1857-86. PubMed ID: 22438170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.
    Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.