These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10347653)
1. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis]. Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies]. Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis: when and how. Imperiale TF Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation. Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Viechtbauer W Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes. Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences. Bonett DG Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods]. Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research. Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review. Downer MC; Moles DR; Speight PM Community Dent Health; 2004 Jun; 21(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15228202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A meta-regression analysis shows no impact of design characteristics on outcome in trials on tension-type headaches. Verhagen AP; de Vet HC; Willemsen S; Stijnen T J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 18359608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to read a review paper. Callcut RA; Branson RD Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]